Running Game with Minimum Specs

[Moolex]

Here is the deal:
My computer exceeds minimum specs on everything except Graphics Card and RAM.
I have
Windows ME
1.37 Ghz AMD ATHLON
40 Gig HD
64 MB Geforce 2 MX 400
<*EDIT*> Tottally forgot to put RAM in, but its 256, also minimum spec

So, my main question is wether or not the game is worth having at my current specs. I definetly plan to upgrade in the near future and i wonder if i should buy PS now or wait till my Ram and Graphics are boosted

[MrVulcan]

1. what is your ram
2. The 32 meg card may give you problems, you may need to look into that

3. Game runs great on a P3 866 mhz, 3/4ths ghz ram, 64 meg card

[Moolex]

Would i be better off upgrading Ram to 512 and Video to 64, or just upgrading my video to 128 and leaving memory

[Quailman]

I also don't have the game yet, but I was in beta. I have 256mb RAM and a 32mb video card. It ran perfectly, so my suggestion is to save your money for now. In the beginning of beta I was stressed out about how I was gonna get the money for a new video card and more RAM and everything. Buut, towards the end of beta everything was smooth and quick and ended up saving about $200 which is alot for me since I'm 15. Hope this helps.

[BUGGER]

My friend is only 13 and he got 3000 someodd bucks....

[bryan25]

i had a 64 Mb graphics card and PS barely ran i mean i could barley see and it froze up often. I am pretty sure its your graphics card.

[Moolex]

So i still need to know if the game is runnable with minimum specs

[Demdadar]

if you have got engough money , upgrade everything . It's really worth .

[TheEvilBlight]

(Another open beta tester who is too cheap to get the game)

I have 512MB of ram but have a GF2 32MB.

If you set all your stuff to minimum you should be fine. I lowered all my resolution, used triple buffer and turned off graphic pre-fetch...used maximum "render distance", it functioned alright in the medium scale battles. The devs were getting their code right near the end of beta...