Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: line starts here.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2003-06-12, 10:57 AM | [Ignore Me] #16 | ||
Sig Mastah!
|
First, I'd like to say GG on the lock (even tho locking continents isn't that rare, even up against a sanc if the zerg is in). Second, I'd like to say bring that shit to Emerald and we will show you what happens to disloyal colonists. But wait until late next week when I'm back from my vacation (t-minus 5 hours to departure... Take that, Job, and Computers, and everything here!)
__________________
[ Been a while, desu ne? ] |
||
|
2003-06-12, 12:39 PM | [Ignore Me] #18 | |||
Sergeant
|
Here's an invitation to flame me. I think the DC should be immune to captured strikers as well. Every now and again there's a WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH, from far away and I take a dirtnap because some idiot TR didn't destroy his striker before he fell. I was kidding BTW, but I do die to captured strikers of course. |
|||
|
2003-06-12, 12:39 PM | [Ignore Me] #19 | ||
Private
|
I have on balance issue not related to the nerfs, but to the TR maxes.
If you're a TR AV max and you "anchor" anywhere near a Magmower, it'll just run you over. Hell it'll run you over even if you're not. I don't think this is really fair, as it is supposed to be an anti-vehicle max, not a speedbump. I guess it goes for NC too but the TR max is really range dependant. As I dont play TR I don't know if its really an issue, but it would seem like one to me. |
||
|
2003-06-12, 01:39 PM | [Ignore Me] #22 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
If you anchor your MAX outdoors you're kind of asking for it anyhow. I found that the anchor is pretty much only useful in stairwells or defending a CC. Anything with more room than that and you're just asking for people to run around you and take pot shots from behind while you try and take the anchor off and turn around. The anchor is useful at times but it's probably used significantly less than the other MAX special abilities.
|
||
|
2003-06-12, 01:47 PM | [Ignore Me] #23 | ||
Sergeant
|
Any Nerf has nothing to do with the VS performance as of late.
They are no longer the underdogs they claim to be. Their population numbers are about the same as the other 3 empires (that fluxuates like all empires of course), and the last 3 or 4 days they've conquered more bases than the NC have. WHich i think is odd since the NC have always been the ones kicking ass and taking names on Markov. (other than TR) Everyone focus's on TR and NC. I hate NC, and used to pity VS. But in all seriousness, they just got their act together and hardly anyone noticed tell now. So if you want to claim your success on the nerfing of another empires piece of equpiment thats fine.. your only belittling yourselves and no one else. |
||
|
2003-06-12, 02:02 PM | [Ignore Me] #24 | ||
Its a pattern I've seen in DAoC. The continent was overrun because of the nerf, but not in the way you might think.
The Vanu have been fealing down and out because their weapons packed too little punch. Now, they've regained confidence because they are more on-par with the Terrans, while the Terrans are less confident about their position. Give it a week or so before you judge the nerf, that should be enough time for the moral on either side to even out. Meanwhile, the NC continues to kick ass.
__________________
Some say power corrupts, I say the corrupt seek power. |
|||
|
2003-06-12, 02:12 PM | [Ignore Me] #25 | |||
First Sergeant
|
|
|||
|
2003-06-12, 02:35 PM | [Ignore Me] #26 | |||
Staff Sergeant
|
|
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|