Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: If your parents get divorced, who gets the fish?
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2003-07-27, 06:04 PM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
Lieutenant General
|
God that place is a flame zone. Anyway, he should play as VS and realize how "different" (I don't really wanna say overpowered becouse it feels like whinning) it is. I think they should make each one good on certain ways. The Jachammer, should obviously be good at close range. As for the others, I don't know.
|
||
|
2003-07-27, 06:36 PM | [Ignore Me] #6 | ||
Private
|
My only problem with the Lasher is, I kill just as well with it close-range as medium-range. Allow me to elaborate.
I've only used one once (picked it off a dead barney) and was able to pop off 2 VS from about 50m or so. Death at this range is unheard of with my JH (but at close range, that's nothing to gasp at). Then I went ahead and knocked off another 2 VS that happened to be in the same room as me. Wow now. It's very bloody close (if not equal) to the JH in close quarters, and at medium range it's the best HA out there. But how would you tone-down it's CQB strengths? I sure as piss don't know. Back on topic - bloody good job to Twist for playing the game from a neutral point, and allowing himself a better idea of reality. Rather than the majority of MMO dev's that simply allow the CSRs to do the reading (not even playing). I'd love for more dev-involvement with regards to the gaming. |
||
|
2003-07-27, 07:30 PM | [Ignore Me] #9 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
EDIT: If I don't have anything nice to say...I should just edit everything I have to say.
Hopefully they will get a good idea. Lots of people on that thread contributed good stuff. However, this issue has been nagging me: If both the MCG and Lasher were upgraded at the same time, and all the VS say the Lasher is balanced, then how come the NC aren't crying about the MCG? After all, if HA was balanced, we'd be complaining about the MCG just as much, right? Right? Last edited by WritheNC; 2003-07-27 at 07:36 PM. |
||
|
2003-07-27, 07:34 PM | [Ignore Me] #10 | ||
First Sergeant
|
Yes indeed it is. Twist's tests are only being done due to the unrelenting whining coming from folks such as yourself. And judging by Twist's post, he dosen't seem too blown away by the Lasher's effectiveness. You've just been given a bigass pacifier.
__________________
|
||
|
2003-07-27, 07:36 PM | [Ignore Me] #11 | |||
Lieutenant General
|
i dont think the lasher needs to have slower bullets or do less damage... but it does do a LOT of damage to armored things like vehicles and infantry. Just a small inbalance that i think needs to be fixed. ack those people on the OF "N3rF teh lasher!!!1!!!1!" ban.
__________________
|
|||
|
2003-07-27, 07:44 PM | [Ignore Me] #12 | |||
First Lieutenant
|
EDIT(again): All I want is for two things: for it not to lash after 20-30m, so then a near miss is just that; a near miss, not 'xx' health lost. Then most MA users would stand a chance. The other is lower the damage vs. hard targets. If you think that would totally "nerf" the lasher then maybe I should hand the pacifier back? And no I don't care if you were referring to my post or not. Last edited by WritheNC; 2003-07-27 at 07:49 PM. |
|||
|
2003-07-27, 08:12 PM | [Ignore Me] #13 | |||
Corporal
|
|
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|