Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
PSU: Where the cake-pie war wages on
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #16 | ||
Well technically Napster was
![]() And they're not websites, they're P2P programs marketted for legal uses and then abused. In effect it is not the program breaking the law but the users. Such a website however, would clearly be the source illegal material. Last edited by Lartnev; 2004-07-21 at 05:36 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #18 | |||
Lieutenant General
|
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #20 | ||
Sharing freeware and Opensource. Sharing music/software that people have recorded/programmed by themselves and want to share. Stuff like that.
I think napster did a thing where you paid them, then they paid royalties to music companies for the sharing. Hence making it sorta legal by agreement. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|