Artillery Support - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: give me back my spoons!
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2011-07-19, 12:35 PM   [Ignore Me] #1
BronzeElemental
Private
 
Artillery Support


Why can't we order in mortar strikes or long-range ground support? It's a vital part of large scale warfare that has been missing from PS for as long as I've played. We need high-angled indirect fire!

What if squad leaders could call it in on specific spots or mark targets for bombing runs? What if there are missile strikes that people can call in from time to time as a reward for capturing objectives or maybe kill streaks?
BronzeElemental is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 12:38 PM   [Ignore Me] #2
Coreldan
Colonel
 
Coreldan's Avatar
 
Re: Artillery Support


I would prefer this to be actually player driven thing. Like take the concept of Flails (but preferably a whole new vehicle that is more like real artillery) and improve on that making the teamwork between the commanders and the artillery guy somehow better.

So yes, but I think the artillery-thingies should still need a player to operate.
Coreldan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 12:40 PM   [Ignore Me] #3
Death2All
Major
 
Death2All's Avatar
 
Misc Info
Re: Artillery Support


Anything that remotely resembles the Flail is bad news.


Although they did hint at a possible "siege" ability for your tank further in the skill tree.
__________________

Death2AllVS/TR/NC
Rekeer
AliENaTiON
Death2All is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 12:42 PM   [Ignore Me] #4
Valdae
Sergeant
 
Valdae's Avatar
 
Re: Artillery Support


We had the Flail. And it was annoying as hell.

As for missile strikes, well, we have this instead:
Valdae is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 12:43 PM   [Ignore Me] #5
WarChimp130
Master Sergeant
 
Re: Artillery Support


I wouldn't be surprised if we did see it. I mean we had the Flail(which people hated if I remember correctly), but I'd like to see another incarnation of an artillery vehicle and Infantry used Mortars. How much ass would that kick to be able to lob shells into CY's from up on hills?

I guess to a certain extent the Scorpion served this need, but it was kind of shitty and annoying.
WarChimp130 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 12:45 PM   [Ignore Me] #6
CutterJohn
Colonel
 
Re: Artillery Support


I'm not terribly keen on the long range style artillery in a flail as a playstyle. It has little redeeming gameplay quality. Point at reticle, fire, wait 20s for kill spam. Not very compelling.


A short ranged mortar for clearing out nasty infantry infestations might not be bad.
CutterJohn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 12:46 PM   [Ignore Me] #7
Rbstr
Contributor
Lieutenant General
 
Rbstr's Avatar
 
Misc Info
Re: Artillery Support


Don't start the kill streaks nonsense again. Higby already said we weren't getting COD-style streak bonus things.

I'm all for some better artillery options.
But don't make it out like these things don't exist in some form. What is an OS if not a called in high angle artillery strike analogue?
Honestly, if more artillery shows up it should be player served. Like the flail but more like a howitzer. So you can actually blow it up and prevent its use.
Man portable mortars would also be cool.

Also: Squadleaders have things called waypoints, which can be used to mark specific spots...what exactly new are you suggesting there?
__________________

All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others.
Rbstr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 12:50 PM   [Ignore Me] #8
Valdae
Sergeant
 
Valdae's Avatar
 
Re: Artillery Support


That said I liked the mortar strikes in BC2. At least it gave players a chance to get the hell out of the way, unlike insta-death flail.
Valdae is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 12:51 PM   [Ignore Me] #9
DviddLeff
Lieutenant Colonel
 
DviddLeff's Avatar
 
Re: Artillery Support


So you want to call in a magic artillery strike or bombing run... when you could just ask a real player to fire the cannon or man the bombers?

Ridiculous.

Manned artillery such as mortars and bombers should be a part of the game; and it should be totally teamwork dependant. Oh, and the OS should be removed from PS2, unless you can have a player in orbit firing the cannon...
__________________
DviddLeff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 12:55 PM   [Ignore Me] #10
BronzeElemental
Private
 
Re: Artillery Support


I was kinda meaning that the squad leader marks a target for bombardment/bombing/whatever and then if someone else from the same empire completes that request both the squad leader AND the player who completed it get a bonus of some kind (extra xp or whatever).

That way you have incentive for people to actively help each other. Also we have unmanned drones and unmanned airstrikes/missile strikes in the real world and PS is supposed to be set in a future with more advanced technology so it makes sense that you should be able to call down SOMETHING without another player having to sit around in a chair waiting to push a button.
BronzeElemental is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 12:58 PM   [Ignore Me] #11
WarChimp130
Master Sergeant
 
Re: Artillery Support


I also agree that they shouldn't make it so long ranged like the Flail. Something with shorter range.
WarChimp130 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 01:29 PM   [Ignore Me] #12
HELLFISH88
First Sergeant
 
HELLFISH88's Avatar
 
Re: Artillery Support


I for one liked the flail, it was the most "realistic" game artillery I have ever seen in term's that it was still operated by a player, accommodating laze targeting and a ludicris range.
HELLFISH88 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 01:38 PM   [Ignore Me] #13
basti
Brigadier General
 
Misc Info
Re: Artillery Support


The Flail was awesome, heck the flail is awesome.

It requires at least one guy to actually fire the thing, and one guy to find and pinpoint targets.

What sucked was the ability to just spam them at certain points. Having 5-10 flails bombing a base over long long range made it impossible to pull vehicles, means you cant actually kill the flails. A much slower ROF would fix that. Let a single hit do much more damage, taking out everything it hits directly and damaging everything close quite heavly, but make those shots count, like with a ROF of 1 shot per minute. On top of that, let people require that the target is lazed in order to shoot. That pretty much denies to possibility of spamming that thing, and forces players to cooperate to use it.

In addition, make the atillery easy to kill, very easy to kill.
basti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 01:53 PM   [Ignore Me] #14
DashRev
Private
 
DashRev's Avatar
 
Re: Artillery Support


Originally Posted by basti View Post
The Flail was awesome, heck the flail is awesome.

It requires at least one guy to actually fire the thing, and one guy to find and pinpoint targets.

What sucked was the ability to just spam them at certain points. Having 5-10 flails bombing a base over long long range made it impossible to pull vehicles, means you cant actually kill the flails. A much slower ROF would fix that. Let a single hit do much more damage, taking out everything it hits directly and damaging everything close quite heavly, but make those shots count, like with a ROF of 1 shot per minute. On top of that, let people require that the target is lazed in order to shoot. That pretty much denies to possibility of spamming that thing, and forces players to cooperate to use it.

In addition, make the atillery easy to kill, very easy to kill.
I'm also pretty fond of the flail, although I would never use it myself in its current iteration. I think if you took the current flail, slightly increased the projectile speed and added a requirement for the target to be lazed by someone in the area, you might see more players open up to it.

If you designed it like that, you'd see virtually no random flail spam, and it would actually require teamwork (like a Libby or Vulture) rather than luck.

It would also add another role for cloakers to fill in large-scale open-field. Find an AMS or a Lodestar, laze it, and watch as the flail projectile comes roaring in and clears everything out.
DashRev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-19, 01:57 PM   [Ignore Me] #15
Zerikin Loukbel
Private
 
Re: Artillery Support


Making artillery that had multiple shells with smaller splash radius like a real arty would also make it better. When the first shell hits you can try and run for cover at least.
Zerikin Loukbel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 AM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.