Santorum Drops Out

[Malorn]

Meh.

[Figment]

Originally Posted by Malorn

Then it wouldn't be a broken clock; it would be an improperly set clock. A slow clock will eventually be right, though not necessarily twice a day. In that sense a broken clock is more correct than a slow one. Although a slow clock is a broken clock, strictly speaking.

Indeed.

Originally Posted by elfailo

Can everyone at least agree that Rick Santorum is a total hack?

Quiet, we're debating clocks now. =)

[Effective]

Originally Posted by elfailo

Can everyone at least agree that Rick Santorum is a total hack?

Maybe

[Malorn]

Meh.

[CutterJohn]

Edwards is a scumbag, no doubt about it. Santorum, while waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too bible thumpy for my tastes, is all in all a decent enough fellow.


Final decision: Both are lawyers, and so they both suck. But edwards is undoubtedly worse.

[Malorn]

Meh.

[Malorn]

Meh.

[Vash02]

Originally Posted by Malorn

You're going to have to provide references for your slander if you expect to convince anyone.

http://youtu.be/G2vDgDceqNY

[Malorn]

Meh.

[Vash02]

Originally Posted by Malorn

Curiously, the Huffington Post has the largest number of articles on the subject, with MSNBC getting a splash. Saw plenty of left-wing nutjob articles on it, but nothing really from NBC, ABC, or Fox. That makes me question the motive. The content I see is all in response to some comments that don't discuss the context.


It's a big stretch from a politician who may have been either misinformed and/or made some stupid comments to the sort of slander you spewed forth.

Irrational people like you are what pushed me from being a moderate liberal to a moderate conservative. There's only so much asininity one can take.

You're going to question the motive? who's motive? the liberal biased media or the conservative biased media?
They both have clear motives for either mentioning the story or not mentioning it.
I also gave you the source of those news stories with the words coming from Santorum's very own mouth.


You would think an honest man would admit his error and apologise to the nation he just slandered.

Still waiting on that apology from "honest man" Santorum.

[Malorn]

Meh.

[Warborn]

Either you're a far-right libertarian or you're a LEFT-WING NUTJOB COMMUNIST

[Vash02]

Malorn, he didnt just get his facts wrong. He accused an entire nation of murdering their elderly just to gain a few quick votes. That is downright evil, dishonest, slanderous and manipulative. Any honest, moral person would say "Hang on, that cant be right, double check that." But he leapt on it without a second glance.

Also the reason people dont like religous conservatives is not becuase they are different. They dislike them because religous conservatives want to impose religous law on the country.

[Malorn]

Meh.

[Figment]

Santorum did say that same thing about Euthanesia back in 2009. It was wrong then, he was told then and he had three years to check his facts.

He did not.


Surprised?