Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: More fun than you can shake a stick at!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2012-07-16, 08:17 AM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
First Sergeant
|
From the other threads I have read it seems like people believe that everyone will be able to get a tank or plane at will and that the resources will only limit abuses.
Have anyone of you guys played battlefield 2, 2142 or 3? Then you would know that on each battlefield map there are 1-6 combat vehicles on each side while there are 32 players on each side. That means at most there is 1 vehicle per 5 players at any one time and then vehicles respawns slower than infantry. Now as you all probably know PS2 have drawn a lot of inspiration from the battlefield series which would mean that we would have roughly as rare vehicles. No, this isn't a problem. The battlefield series thrived on having a low vehicle count. There are tanks and planes, but ~80-90% of the manpower is on foot. The only ones who will whine about that are stuck up PS1 vets who wants to drive around in a tank or a plane 24/7. Last edited by Klockan; 2012-07-16 at 08:19 AM. |
||
|
2012-07-16, 08:18 AM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
you know some people are so far behind in a race they actually think they're winning
__________________
"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war, and now there ain't no going back. I mean shit, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it! If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight. " Slim Charles aka Tallman - The Wire BRTD Mumble Server powered by Gamercomms |
|||
|
2012-07-16, 08:21 AM | [Ignore Me] #3 | ||
First Sergeant
|
Which discussion are you talking about? This thread wasn't made in answer to one post or one other thread, I have seen this mindset all over the forum. Now, do you have anything to say that pertains to the discussion about the rarity of vehicles?
Last edited by Klockan; 2012-07-16 at 08:27 AM. |
||
|
2012-07-16, 08:21 AM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
Private
|
Even without resources to limit, most if not all capture points require infantry to take. The few who do want to fly or drive 24/7 will be able to. How effective they will be when their infantry dead is another story. I feel this is much ado about nothing.
|
||
|
2012-07-16, 08:24 AM | [Ignore Me] #5 | ||
First Sergeant
|
But then people will just drive to the doors, then jump out as full fledged infantry and take the point. This isn't PS1 where you had dedicated drivers who are able to conjure vehicles at will but sucks at infantry combat, here everyone is viable on foot while still able to pilot everything. The only thing that stops us from seeing everyone in a vehicle is the resource system.
Last edited by Klockan; 2012-07-16 at 08:25 AM. |
||
|
2012-07-16, 08:25 AM | [Ignore Me] #6 | ||
Private
|
I like the idea that vehicles will be a precious resource. If everyone has their own vehicle all the time there is no motivation to work together. In PS1 there were times it was really difficult to find a gunner (or multiple gunners) for your vehicle. Everyone wanted their own.
|
||
|
2012-07-16, 08:28 AM | [Ignore Me] #7 | ||
Corporal
|
The difference between PS and BF is that BF has a small map thus the vehicles are all forced to take part within the confines of the map.
I'm pretty sure you'd join in the whining when you're told you have to walk 1.5 in game Km's to reach your next target because some ass just jumped in the only tank available on the 8km square map I agree with the first person who commented, this isn't battlefield, this is "battleside x 1000" stop making the comparison. |
||
|
2012-07-16, 08:30 AM | [Ignore Me] #8 | |||
Master Sergeant
|
|
|||
|
2012-07-16, 08:30 AM | [Ignore Me] #9 | |||
Private
|
|
|||
|
2012-07-16, 08:33 AM | [Ignore Me] #10 | |||
First Lieutenant
|
|
|||
|
2012-07-16, 08:33 AM | [Ignore Me] #11 | |||
First Sergeant
|
What do this have to do with the topic? If they aren't noobs, yes they will. Last edited by Klockan; 2012-07-16 at 08:35 AM. |
|||
|
2012-07-16, 08:34 AM | [Ignore Me] #12 | |||
Master Sergeant
|
edit: and no vehicles should not be rare - infantry have their place in and around bases and vehicles have their place inbetween Last edited by fod; 2012-07-16 at 08:37 AM. |
|||
|
2012-07-16, 08:36 AM | [Ignore Me] #13 | |||
Corporal
|
Once you're inside a base vehicles are almost useless apart from suppression. EDIT: You're essentially talking about limiting the size of battles that we could have. Why? If your enemy can pull 400 tanks to take to a fight then why can't your team organize the same level of tankage? Last edited by EZShot; 2012-07-16 at 08:41 AM. |
|||
|
2012-07-16, 08:38 AM | [Ignore Me] #14 | |||
First Sergeant
|
Edit: I am not saying that vehicles should be like they are in Bf games with just a set number being spawned, I am saying that the resource system should be roughly as limiting in terms of quantity as the BF series. Ie there should be 1 vehicle per 5-8 people. Last edited by Klockan; 2012-07-16 at 08:41 AM. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|