Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: We <3 devs.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2012-08-13, 06:40 PM | [Ignore Me] #61 | |||
Staff Sergeant
|
|
|||
|
2012-08-13, 06:53 PM | [Ignore Me] #62 | ||
Private
|
im leaning more towards the 2k per cont thing and even then after some days in planetside of seeing every cont locked and ques everywhere i just dont think that SOE would limit thier server like that they want it massive you dont get massive by limiting things
|
||
|
2012-08-13, 07:03 PM | [Ignore Me] #63 | ||
Corporal
|
What we were told pre tech test was 2000 per cont. thats 666 players per faction per cont. with 3 continents were looking at 6000 players per server.
obviously there is going to be more than 6000 people playing at once which is why there will be more than one server per coast line. pretty simple stuff here guys.... |
||
|
2012-08-13, 08:03 PM | [Ignore Me] #64 | |||
First Sergeant
|
__________________
Twitch Stream
Twitch Planetside 2 Stream Group 14 Year Veteran. Progamer. FPS extraordinaire. Watch as I play various FPS titles every night from 9-12 EST |
|||
|
2012-08-14, 10:07 AM | [Ignore Me] #67 | ||
First Sergeant
|
A player character is more complex in PS2 than it was in PS1 - with hitboxes, a player is now actually 5+ objects rather than just one. So I don't think it's productive comparing the number of players in PS1 as if they were 1:1 entities and assuming that PS2 populations will be astronomically higher due to newer tech.
I recognize that the goal is 2000 per continent as stated by the devs many times, but from everything I know and everything I've seen so far, my guess is that the goal was too ambitious and we won't see those numbers at launch. Just my opinion.
__________________
"It's time to fight back..." -Huey |
||
|
2012-08-14, 10:47 AM | [Ignore Me] #68 | ||
Contributor General
|
Yes, opinions of random people on the internet are what counts. Whenever I design software or infrastructure, I simply pay a random person on the internet $50 to hear their opinion on what should be done and then abide by it.
This is obviously how the world works. Deal with it. Factual numbers given by official representatives have been quoted multiple times now (2000/cont), whether you believe these or not doesn't make any difference. Also: everytime I see someone state "I believe there will be clusters of servers", as if that is a deep technical insight, I drown a kitten in mustard.
__________________
General Fyrn <Aesyr®> For the Glory of the Republic. Death to all traitors and fanatics. |
||
|
2012-08-14, 11:15 AM | [Ignore Me] #69 | ||||
First Sergeant
|
They aren't always right. Things change over time and those 2000 numbers are really old. Yes, this is my opinion but based on what I know and what I've seen, I feel confident saying we won't see 2000/cont at launch. Could I be wrong? Sure but it's pretty damn unlikely.
__________________
"It's time to fight back..." -Huey |
||||
|
2012-08-14, 11:40 AM | [Ignore Me] #72 | ||
Sergeant
|
Even if there are battles that feature these many players, I honestly like smaller fights to huge, huge ones. I think 64 opponents is a lot to shoot at, and I don't mind over 200 players. But when it starts getting to the near thousand that might get a little too crazy for me.
I have always been into fighting in fights, but if it's too big and hectic then I like to wander off to cause some small havoc somewhere else, perhaps trying to capture another base. This is just my play style though. |
||
|
2012-08-14, 09:04 PM | [Ignore Me] #73 | |||
Corporal
|
|
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|