Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: my last quote what should I put?
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2003-02-21, 09:42 PM | [Ignore Me] #230 | ||
Ha, well I finally caught up with everyone and it seems that everyone has left. Lex and I love to argue though, so I'm fairly confident that we can rip each other to shreds if need be.
I'll only respond to one thing that Silent said since I am not sure after reading this whole thread what it is that he is trying to argue in favor of. I'll refrain from replying to all the things I would like to because, like Lex said, we would then have three more pages of my replies. I'll also try to refrain from insulting you Silent, so that no one can complain that others are flaming them. Onward to what I will respond to at the moment. Silent stated that "I win anyways, it doesn't look like we're attacking Iraq anytime soon to me." Let's look at that statement. For someone to win an argument, the conclusion of said argument must have been in doubt at the outset of the argument. Otherwise, it is not an argument, but merely one's stating fact. So I'll assume that you are referring to your statements in this thread where you stated that the US will not attack Iraq soon. Considering that this thread just started this morning how is it that you claim victory when you've only given the US twelve hours to attack since this thread began?? Also, I would like to know what information sources you have that show you how close the US is to attacking Iraq. I personally have no sources that inform me of the military's attack schedule, and I somehow doubt that you do either. |
|||
|
2003-02-21, 09:48 PM | [Ignore Me] #235 | ||
Master Sergeant
|
Lol, well if they all left, and they haven't attacked as of yet, then I've won right?
On top of that, the UN hasn't given them the go ahead, France anf Germany are sleeping together, Canada is opposed (so no, you can't have our three warships), people are protesting all over, and if anything is going to happen, we're just going to get more inspectors in there. From a military point of view, I've always felt the U.S. should just go ahead and attack, since they've claimed they were going to with the support of the UN or not, right? What is the point of talking about a pre-emptive strike for a year? That's not very "pre-emptive" is it? On that note, just cause I think they SHOULD go in, doesn't mean I support it. Just like I'm always flamed for calling Osama's attack on the states pure military genius, but I don't support him either. Personally I think we should put his balls in a vice and then shoot at his feet (maybe throw on House of Pain "Jump Around" while we do it), but that doesn't mean it wasn't a good strike from his point of view. |
||
|
2003-02-21, 09:49 PM | [Ignore Me] #236 | |||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
you know you wanna
__________________
|
|||
|
2003-02-21, 09:54 PM | [Ignore Me] #238 | |||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
I disregarded that "I win" comment. I saw it as merely as the culmination of the frustration that was created by trying to argue aginst five or six other people, many of whom were tossing in insults.
__________________
If you hear a voice within you saying, 'You are not a painter,' then by all means paint boy, and that voice will be silenced. ~ Vincent van Gogh Sit Back, Relax, and Enjoy the Action. |
|||
|
2003-02-21, 09:56 PM | [Ignore Me] #240 | ||
Hey, I said he was below you!!! Lemme turn it around.
Abraaxas, you are way better than this silent guy. "well if they all left" Persistance isn't a virtue. "Continually repeating the same actions hoping for a different result" - insanity.
__________________
You First. No more Pearl Harbors. Vist www.bohicagaming.com because we're better than you. Apply|Contact|Forum |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|