Fuego...

[Fragmatic]

Originally Posted by ZeusCali

can we get the definition of spam?

and strygun i'm changing my sig your partaking in spam!!!!

It's not spam.

As I said, don't shit on my thread. If you continue to, I will -

1. Get a job
2. Apply for a debit card (takes 2 weeks to come)
3. Apply for a paypal account (3 days to activate)
4. Pay as much money as I can to get you permabanned from the forums.

Originally Posted by ZeusCali

can we get the definition of spam?

Fucking hypocrite!
You say "oh no, it's spam, ban it, delete it!!!!!""!"!"!"!" and yet you then ask for a definition.

Also, you say I spam, yet I see your name on the last post for the top 4 threads... get your head out of your arse.

[Zodiac]

what the fuck.

[ZeusCali]

frag what are you smoking?

[Fragmatic]

Originally Posted by ZeusCali

frag what are you smoking?

Cigarettes.

Anyway, the threat has been made, choose your decision wisely.

[Ouroboros]

[ZeusCali]

hehehe

[Ouroboros]

Batman is not amused.

[Dharkbayne]

viva La Fuego

[Zodiac]

/wave. Nice pic Ouro.

[UncleDynamite]

Fuego!... I guess.

[Happy lil Elf]

I like how some fourm members seem to have magically attained the ability to create spam threads, and yes, this is indeed a spam thread, and it stays open. Then someone else, who is even relatively well known, can create a spam thread an it gets locked. Actually, no, I think it's rather dumb, or at least I would if I cared one way or the other that is. Spam threads don't really bother me nor do they hold much entertainment for me, so whether they get locked is kind of a non-issue for me personally.

But Zeus does have a valid point, or at least he would if it weren't for a reason I'll get to. There is no definition of spam. Sometimes it gets by, sometimes it doesn't and apparently it is completely arbitrary as far as what does or doesn't get locked.

However, this is not a democracy. This is Hamma's playground and thus he (and those he chooses) gets to make the rules.


*Edit*
P.S.-
Feugo

[Dharkbayne]

Originally Posted by Happy lil' Elf

I like how some fourm members seem to have magically attained the ability to create spam threads, and yes, this is indeed a spam thread, and it stays open. Then someone else, who is even relatively well known, can create a spam thread an it gets locked. Actually, no, I think it's rather dumb, or at least I would if I cared one way or the other that is. Spam threads don't really bother me nor do they hold much entertainment for me, so whether they get locked is kind of a non-issue for me personally.

But Zeus does have a valid point, or at least he would if it weren't for a reason I'll get to. There is no definition of spam. Sometimes it gets by, sometimes it doesn't and apparently it is completely arbitrary as far as what does or doesn't get locked.

However, this is not a democracy. This is Hamma's playground and thus he (and those he chooses) gets to make the rules.


*Edit*
P.S.-
Feugo

Indeed.

HEIL HAMMA!

[Biohazzard56]

Originally Posted by Happy lil' Elf

I like how some fourm members seem to have magically attained the ability to create spam threads, and yes, this is indeed a spam thread, and it stays open. Then someone else, who is even relatively well known, can create a spam thread an it gets locked. Actually, no, I think it's rather dumb, or at least I would if I cared one way or the other that is. Spam threads don't really bother me nor do they hold much entertainment for me, so whether they get locked is kind of a non-issue for me personally.

But Zeus does have a valid point, or at least he would if it weren't for a reason I'll get to. There is no definition of spam. Sometimes it gets by, sometimes it doesn't and apparently it is completely arbitrary as far as what does or doesn't get locked.

However, this is not a democracy. This is Hamma's playground and thus he (and those he chooses) gets to make the rules.

Exactily, this is a blatent spam thread and should be locked.

[Fragmatic]

Originally Posted by Happy lil' Elf

Actually, no, I think it's rather dumb, or at least I would if I cared one way or the other that is. Spam threads don't really bother me nor do they hold much entertainment for me

If you don't care, why post? Why take the effort to reply?

Fact is, if you didn't care, you wouldn't have read it, you would have not bothered, but you do, because you read it, and you replied.

[Happy lil Elf]

Originally Posted by Fragmatic

If you don't care, why post? Why take the effort to reply?

Fact is, if you didn't care, you wouldn't have read it, you would have not bothered, but you do, because you read it, and you replied.

Actually, no. I read it because I had no idea what it was about. Or maybe you had "Worthless spam" in the ittle and I just missed it? No? I didn't think so. Once I saw what it was about I sighed and scolled down hoping there would be something at least marginally intelligent or interesting. Suprisingly there was, and not only that but it was coming from, of all people, Zeus.

People were jumping on Zeus even though he had a valid point. That annoys me and gave me an opening to make a point reguarding the arbitrary way in which spam is dertermined and thus, the conversation may have actually become interesting to me. The edited in "Fuego" was done both in jest and it mollify the other...people who had already participated in the spam.

GG, Frag, but you lose this one, sorry