Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact - Page 2 - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: This planetside isn't big enough for the both of us.
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Reply
Click here to go to the first VIP post in this thread.  
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2012-03-30, 03:54 AM   [Ignore Me] #16
Notser
Staff Sergeant
 
Notser's Avatar
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


Additional Discussion - Pricing

Totalbiscuit brought up a interesting point about Tribes Ascend's pricing and how it would influence buying habits of players. Primary weapons cost around 10 US dollars, Secondary 5, Equipment 3, and skins starting at 10 and some costing up to 15 dollars. Do you feel that 10 bucks is too much, just right, or too little to charge for a weapon/skin? Remember, Tribes is going for sidegrades versus straight up better items which is exactly what PS2 will be going for with their weapons.

I personally feel 10 bucks is a little too much for a primary weapon, also think skins shouldn't cost 10 bucks unless they are really cool and have new animations. There is the school of thought that since PS2 will allow weapons to be used across multiple classes when it makes sense that you would be getting more for your money then Tribes, where weapons are locked to each class.

What would be a fair price for SOE to charge for weapons/skins/animation effects/etc? Also along those lines, how much time spent earning the in-game currency should it take to purchase those same weapons? I'd personally like to see weapon purchases with in-game currency to occur around 1 per week with normal playtime. Obviously prices would vary per weapon.
Notser is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 04:38 AM   [Ignore Me] #17
Atheosim
Captain
 
Atheosim's Avatar
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


I really, really hope that something as incredibly inane as a cosmetic item doesn't reach any further that $5 USD. 10 and 15 is ludicrous.

Edit: For all the smartasses, I know I don't have to buy it.

Last edited by Atheosim; 2012-03-30 at 04:40 AM.
Atheosim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 05:33 AM   [Ignore Me] #18
CutterJohn
Colonel
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


Originally Posted by Atheosim View Post
I really, really hope that something as incredibly inane as a cosmetic item doesn't reach any further that $5 USD. 10 and 15 is ludicrous.

Edit: For all the smartasses, I know I don't have to buy it.
Frankly, the cosmetic items are the aspect they should attempt to make the most profit off of. If that means gouging, so be it.

They may be inane items, but they also have absolutely zero effect on gameplay, so if people want to blow money on it, by all means, let them spend as much as they wish.
CutterJohn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 05:48 AM   [Ignore Me] #19
Atheosim
Captain
 
Atheosim's Avatar
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


Originally Posted by CutterJohn View Post
Frankly, the cosmetic items are the aspect they should attempt to make the most profit off of. If that means gouging, so be it.

They may be inane items, but they also have absolutely zero effect on gameplay, so if people want to blow money on it, by all means, let them spend as much as they wish.
Sadly, you're exactly right. No smedbux from me though if they gouge it past all reason.
Atheosim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 05:57 AM   [Ignore Me] #20
Mezorin
Corporal
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


Again, the devs have said anything that involves "power" or gear will be buy-able with in game currency. Its reasonable to assume that this will also include future releases of content. Of course, some guns may have 'short cuts' when it comes to guns you can unlock. And the easy path to the dark side is the newest toy on the market should be 'better' than the old stuff to encourage people to buy it, but for face value I am going to take Higby's word for face value on there being no 'pay to win' schemes going on.

I figure if they release new class tools/vehicles that it will be more like champions in League of Legends. Yeah, everyone will bum rush to play those new tank cannons, or that new wifflebat MAX suits can now equip, but that just means that you have stuff to spend your resources on every month as you play. Remember, resource economies in MMOs need drains to them, especially with resources being our major motivation for fighting. A lot of new things will SEEM OP at first (and some maybe legitimately so cause devs aren't perfect), but that is only because everyone and their dog are using them, and nobody has figured out the counters to them yet. EVERY patch of League of Legends brings much bitching about the new kid on the block champion, but after 3 weeks suddenly they're not so bad. Smart players figure out the strategies/counters to the new content, scrubs cry on the forums. Food for thought.

The only thing that would seriously piss me off that SOE could do here are the "rental" systems a lot of F2P games have for their items. Want to have subscriber exclusive account perks, conveniences, and customizations, okay fine. Same with one time purchase items. I don't mind tossing a few bucks a month at this game if the stuff in it is awesome, and I get to keep my fuzzy dice for my Lightning once I bought it. Personally, I hope T-Ray can buy a yacht with all the proceeds from tank related accessories we have in this game . But putting a 10 dollar per month rental tag on my bolt driver or lightning custom gauss cannon is *not* cool, and the practice in Battlefield Online and a lot of Korean games is despicable.
Mezorin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 06:13 AM   [Ignore Me] #21
Sabrak
Contributor
First Sergeant
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


Wow, $10 would be way too much for a cosmetic stuff (except, maybe, if it's for a pack?).

But, in a way, if they really don't plan on selling more powerful items in the store (let's trust Higby and the team on that), they will probably need to make players pay more for aesthetics so they get money out of the game.
Sabrak is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 06:43 AM   [Ignore Me] #22
Vancha
Colonel
 
Vancha's Avatar
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


Honestly, £2 would be the sweet-spot for me, which equates to about $3.2 (lets say $3).

5 items for £10/$15

As far as class packs, I don't see the need. Introduce content for multiple classes simultaneously and you don't end up with an overpopulation of a single class. I'd rather see 1 new item for each class than 6 new items for a single class.
Vancha is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 06:51 AM   [Ignore Me] #23
CutterJohn
Colonel
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


Originally Posted by Atheosim View Post
Sadly, you're exactly right. No smedbux from me though if they gouge it past all reason.
Of course. They will have to determine the sweet spot for price and volume to maximize income.
CutterJohn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 10:41 AM   [Ignore Me] #24
SniperSteve
First Lieutenant
 
SniperSteve's Avatar
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


Whenever you push out new content, it gets overplayed the first few days, then it settles into the mix after a week. I think that is true whether it is themed or not.

(I just think of LoL when a new champion comes out. You see it being played in almost every game for the next few days, then it goes back to routine. The good news is that = easy kills. ^_^)

Edit: And I think the price of more than $5 for a skin is normal... It does not effect gameplay and is a VIP item. If you want it, expect to pay big time.
__________________

Last edited by SniperSteve; 2012-03-30 at 10:44 AM.
SniperSteve is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 11:06 AM   [Ignore Me] #25
Vancha
Colonel
 
Vancha's Avatar
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


Originally Posted by SniperSteve View Post
Edit: And I think the price of more than $5 for a skin is normal... It does not effect gameplay and is a VIP item. If you want it, expect to pay big time.
This is such a wrong mentality. F2P and cash shops are still very much being experimented with and still being refined. There's no point them selling an item for $8 if they'd sell thee times more at $3.
Vancha is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 12:24 PM   [Ignore Me] #26
EVILPIG
Contributor
Colonel
 
EVILPIG's Avatar
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


Personally, I find it ridiculous that so many feel that $10 is too much for something you will always own from that day on. The game is "free to play", but some of us will need to contribute something to pay for the game and it's future. There will be no cost to install the game, so you're already starting out ahead and the game looks worthy of having a subscription, so if you spend $10-15 a month on stuff, it would be well deserved. I just can't believe people expect to never spend a dime. It's certainly an option, but they hardly deserve that considering what they are putting out for us.
__________________
"That which does not kill us,
makes us stronger
" -Nietzsche

www.planetside-devildogs.com
EVILPIG is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 01:26 PM   [Ignore Me] #27
Vancha
Colonel
 
Vancha's Avatar
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


Originally Posted by EVILPIG View Post
Personally, I find it ridiculous that so many feel that $10 is too much for something you will always own from that day on. The game is "free to play", but some of us will need to contribute something to pay for the game and it's future. There will be no cost to install the game, so you're already starting out ahead and the game looks worthy of having a subscription, so if you spend $10-15 a month on stuff, it would be well deserved. I just can't believe people expect to never spend a dime. It's certainly an option, but they hardly deserve that considering what they are putting out for us.
Their concern is not just the amount people are paying, but how many people are paying it. Think about all the children trying to persuade their parents to give up $10 for something to make their gun look pretty..."But the game developers deserve it!" isn't going to cut it. Think about all the strapped-for-cash students wondering whether to spend $10 on a pretty helmet, or half that on the newest indie bundle. What do you think is better value for money, an in-game ornament or multiple games?
Vancha is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 02:00 PM   [Ignore Me] #28
CuddlyChud
Staff Sergeant
 
CuddlyChud's Avatar
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


I think ultimately it'll be up to statistics to tell you whether you've gotten the price right or not, something that I'm sure SOE will have plenty of given their previous experiences with F2P. Personally I feel like 8-10$ seems reasonable for a gun or skin. You need to set the price high enough that it feels semi-exclusive. Ultimately its just about finding a balance.
CuddlyChud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 03:26 PM   [Ignore Me] #29
Cosmical
Contributor
Cosmic Comics
 
Cosmical's Avatar
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


I think the best thing they can do is lock you down to one faction, and one character. And if you want more you have to pay for character slots, then once they have your payment details, 30p here 1 dollar there. And theyre making money.
__________________
[email protected] - e-mail me a pic of you, with the name you want, and faction you want to fight for.
DRAW a comic about Cowboys (kind of)
VALENTINE A comic about dimension jumping.
Chinese New Year 1 / Chinese New Year 2 A Comic about mediocrity.... and bizarre stuff.
Cosmical is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 04:15 PM   [Ignore Me] #30
EVILPIG
Contributor
Colonel
 
EVILPIG's Avatar
 
Re: Tribes F2P Business Model - PS2 Impact


Originally Posted by Vancha View Post
Their concern is not just the amount people are paying, but how many people are paying it. Think about all the children trying to persuade their parents to give up $10 for something to make their gun look pretty..."But the game developers deserve it!" isn't going to cut it. Think about all the strapped-for-cash students wondering whether to spend $10 on a pretty helmet, or half that on the newest indie bundle. What do you think is better value for money, an in-game ornament or multiple games?
So, you're in the FREE camp.
__________________
"That which does not kill us,
makes us stronger
" -Nietzsche

www.planetside-devildogs.com
EVILPIG is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 PM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.