Medic/Engi tools damaging enemies.

[Skitrel]

Originally Posted by Zulthus

It's perfectly valid. No one cares about the original point except you. It's a fallacy saying that everyone knows my example is stupid, because you cannot know that for sure. Can you give a valid negative to it? I haven't seen one yet. Breaking the visual aesthetic is an opinion and there are no facts to back it up. Fallacy fallacy fallacy slippery hurr.

Are you also religious? Or a member of the tea party perhaps? You debate like a Christian.

[Saintlycow]

Make them not very viable, but extremely humiliating

[Zulthus]

Originally Posted by Skitrel

Are you also religious? Or a member of the tea party perhaps? You debate like a Christian.

You obviously have been backed into a corner as you have nothing valid to refute my argument with.

[Skitrel]

Originally Posted by Zulthus

You obviously have been backed into a corner as you have nothing valid to refute my argument with.

Your argument is an informal fallacy. There is no argument. "No you" is also not a valid argument. Address the points made instead of diverting to something entirely irrelevant. This is not a discussion about muffin guns, it is a discussion about damaging engi and medic weapons.

[Blackwolf]

Originally Posted by NewSith

I don't see how TRAPS can allow friendly vehicles to pass through them, or mines don't explode after friendlies stepping on/infront of them. =)

IFF signatures... PS1 had them.

But no in all seriousness I think this is a wonderful idea. That way, when I want to be all medical, I can kill people slowly by deconstructing them over a long period of time while they sip tea and chat with me about their plans for taking over the base I'm defending. I would never need to shoot a gun again...

And skitrel, your point was that there was nothing wrong with it and only positive stuff about it. My counter point is that there's nothing positive about it and only negative things. Counter away. You have no argument, except that it would be "funny" and some people "deserve it". Why do I get the feeling you are one of those people?

[Zulthus]

Originally Posted by Skitrel

Your argument is an informal fallacy. There is no argument. "No you" is also not a valid argument. Address the points made instead of diverting to something entirely irrelevant. This is not a discussion about muffin guns, it is a discussion about damaging engi and medic weapons.

As Blackwolf said, you have no argument. You are simply trying to divert attention away from yourself. This is a discussion about muffin guns, and is very relevant.

[NewSith]

Originally Posted by Zulthus

As Blackwolf said, you have no argument. You are simply trying to divert attention away from yourself. This is a discussion about muffin guns, and is very relevant.

I hereby accuse you of trolling.

[bullet]

Originally Posted by Zulthus

As Blackwolf said, you have no argument. You are simply trying to divert attention away from yourself. This is a discussion about muffin guns, and is very relevant.

I'm glad my muffin guns idea is going somewhere, maybe I should make a new thread about it.

OT (I guess), as people have said theres no benefit to having it in game other than to flex your epeen. If you feel the need to humiliate people in an online game, go play halo/cod/bf please.

[Zulthus]

Originally Posted by NewSith

I hereby accuse you of trolling.

Not at all. I'm simply debating with Skitrel in the exact same way he debates with everyone else.

[Hamma]

You all need to learn how to utilize the ignore feature.