Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: where pillaging coffins is not only legal, but fun
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2013-03-04, 11:26 AM | [Ignore Me] #16 | |||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
Personally, more logistical Vehicles that are unarmed and require support is good in my book. This jack of all, I can counter everything alone, is becoming pervasive. Last edited by MrBloodworth; 2013-03-04 at 11:27 AM. |
|||
|
2013-03-04, 12:27 PM | [Ignore Me] #19 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
Every time I think of the loadstar, all i see is how the Versatility of the Sunderer in this incarnation just steps on so many possible vehicle roles.
It already has most of the loadstars capabilities, AND the AMS. Wasted possibilities IMO. |
||
|
2013-03-04, 12:51 PM | [Ignore Me] #20 | ||
I don't think warpgate refits are unreasonable. On the other hand, I'm never near it when I determine I've totally fucked up my fit. Tech plants? Dunno. Maybe a bridge too far.
I think the thing that bugs me is that I'm supposed to accept that fully functional missiles are spun from raw matter and mystically teleported into place onto my racks when I land. This same wizardry, however, can't bolt the afterburner tank back on. Ah well - c'est la auraxis! |
|||
|
2013-03-05, 01:38 AM | [Ignore Me] #22 | |||
Private
|
Hasn't happened again cause it's at the front of my mind now ; P As long as it's to change your role for another period of time and not back and forth on the fly, I vote for this. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|