Originally Posted by Thunder_Hawk
i feel that there is a redundancy with who is controling the planet. there is the logo above the planet, the color glow of the planet, and the area it ocupies in the radial grid. i think the most effective one is the empire logo but the color glow is nice. the color on the grid seems to break up the starfield background and i personally dislike it.
|
The logo and planet glow denote Capitol Domination. The grid color denotes a planet lock.
Yes, all extra information would have a toggle.
I also feel that it is redunant listing how map bases your empire ontrols in the interstellar view. people can quickly glance to the side and see how many bases your empire controls.
|
A chorus of posters were desiring as much information in the center area as possible, whether it's redudant with the side windows or not. They didn't want to have to look at a planet then search up and down the sides for the corresponding continent to get the information they needed. Having toggled info in the center provides an easy compromise. If people don't want to see that, they can leave it off.
yet another question i have, on the planetary view, will the warpgrate's color reflect the empire controling the other side? ie: the wg is red if tr has a lock on the other side
|
The warpgate colors will probably stay as the devs have made them, to help people recognize which gate links to what gate on another continent. As for links themselves, fredthedeadhead has suggested that very thing, showing friendly or enemy links branching off from the continents in the side windows. In the Slight Map Change thread (see link above), I believe he has an illustration already made up for people to check out.