Petition: Force Rockstar to put GTA:VC on X-Box

[Dharkbayne]

Originally Posted by Mag-Mower

Double post, sorry



1. Not true, PS2 is easily capable of reaching life-like graphics, why dont companys make life like games on the PS2? they are too fucking lazy, PS2 and XBox are capable of the same thing

2. I disagree, the PS2 controller feels much more comfortable

3. This one is True

4. Good point, but lets say you wanted to show of your car collection in Burnout 3, you can do that with the PS2's memory card, and lets say, for some reason you have 2 XBox's because you like to link, and your main console (with all of your saved games) breaks? or lets say your HD breaks? then what are you gonna do? atleast with the PS2, you can transfer one set of data to an other console...

5. Yea it does, but that doesnt mean its better, like i said befor, developers are too fucking lazy to optimize code and all that crap.

PS2 wins

1. No. No it's not. PS2 cannot reach the graphical power of the Xbox.

2. That's a matter of opinion, personally, my hands are big, and the PS2 controller feels way too small, and square, and after playing for about 30 minutes, my hands begin to ache.


3. True.

4. They have memory cards - You just don't NEED them to save things.


5. Yes it DOES mean it's better. Compare any PS2 exclusive game to any Xbox exclusive game.

[Triggar]

Originally Posted by Dharkbayne

my hands are big

[Dharkbayne]

Originally Posted by Triggar

[Hamma]

Just buy it on PC

[Hamma]

Originally Posted by Dharkbayne

1. No. No it's not. PS2 cannot reach the graphical power of the Xbox.

And I'm sure you are some kind of respected Software/Hardware engineer.

You don't have any idea what you are talking about.

[Dharkbayne]

Originally Posted by Hamma

And I'm sure you are some kind of respected Software/Hardware engineer.

You don't have any idea what you are talking about.

You don't need to be, just look at the specs, HERE

[EarlyDawn]

Owned

[Infernus]

Originally Posted by Mag-Mower

Double post, sorry



1. Not true, PS2 is easily capable of reaching life-like graphics, why dont companys make life like games on the PS2? they are too fucking lazy, PS2 and XBox are capable of the same thing

2. I disagree, the PS2 controller feels much more comfortable

3. This one is True

4. Good point, but lets say you wanted to show of your car collection in Burnout 3, you can do that with the PS2's memory card, and lets say, for some reason you have 2 XBox's because you like to link, and your main console (with all of your saved games) breaks? or lets say your HD breaks? then what are you gonna do? atleast with the PS2, you can transfer one set of data to an other console...

5. Yea it does, but that doesnt mean its better, like i said befor, developers are too fucking lazy to optimize code and all that crap.

PS2 wins

1. In graphical capability the XBox > PS2... just look at the specs...

2. Mad Catz makes a playstation sized controller... or you can buy the 10 dollar or whatever controller switcher that lets you use your PS2 controller on the Xbox.

3. Lower Load Times

4. You can buy a memory card that happen to be like twice the size of a PS2 memory card I think it is, never needed one personally... I still have 100,000+ blocks left.

5. No Comment... I own both...

[Baneblade]

The specs of my PalmPilot pwn both of them so stfu.

[Rbstr]

computers > consoles.

The hardware abilities of he Consoles go Xbox>GameCube>PS2

[MrVicchio]

I have a GBA GCN(jens but its at my house) PS2 X-Box 2 PC's P4 1.8gighertz + with 2 gigs of ram each.


I think I am covered.

[WritheNC]

There are some games for console which would be rediculous to play on PC, such as SSBM.

This is what I need consoles for. Because Super Smash Brothers Melee is the best fighting game. EVER.

[BUGGER]

FPSs=Computer
Sports, platform, etc, and Halo=consols.

FPS's are easier on computer main because the mouse and a wider area to use buttons. Sports and other games are better on consols, as in a racing game. Do you want to constantly hit the turn button just to make a minor turn (assuming you dont have a joystick) or do you just wanna pull alittle on the analoge?

xbox>ps2, only thing ps2 has is like grand turismo and metal gear solid which is now everywhere. so ha.


the memory card does kind of beat xbox though, i mean if you xbox does happen to break.

[ChewyLSB]

Burnout 3 was optimized for the PS2, so Burnout 3 is a much different story, since when it was ported to XBox, there were absolutely no graphical enhancements.

I've never truly seen what's so great about good graphics. Great... a game looks good. How does this effect gameplay? Not at all. When I'm purchasing a game, graphics is just about the last thing I look at... which is why XBox isn't appealing to me at all.

[Dharkbayne]

Originally Posted by ChewyLSB

Burnout 3 was optimized for the PS2, so Burnout 3 is a much different story, since when it was ported to XBox, there were absolutely no graphical enhancements.

I've never truly seen what's so great about good graphics. Great... a game looks good. How does this effect gameplay? Not at all. When I'm purchasing a game, graphics is just about the last thing I look at... which is why XBox isn't appealing to me at all.

Not true. Graphics help tell a story. Alot of games wouldn't work with crappy graphics, as some rely on it for parts of their gameplay (Thief 3, Doom 3, Splinter Cell)