the graphics might beat HALOS

[R KELLY]

the graphics in PS might beat HALO and possibly HALO2
TOO bad halo isnt a maasive multiplayer game

[Ludio]

I think it will have better graphics than HALO before GeforceFx comes out. As for HALO 2, I cant say because I havent seen any screenshots, but I imagine it will be about equal.

Of course this doesnt really matter at all because the graphics are only going to be part of the game, the gameplay is going to kickass, and HALO is only on the Xbox, while this is only on the PC. (And yes I know HALO is coming out on PC at the end of the year, two years too late)

[Lexington_Steele]

It will be better than Halo if your system can run it to its limits.

I don't think it will be prettier than Halo 2. I have seen some early Halo 2 screens and they look real nice.

[jamikey]

some of the screen shots from halo2 look at least as good as the ones from doom3 and thats saying alot.

[Squeeky]

Omg its R. Kelly, Damn pedo

[Zanzibar]

dont you mean matt kelly? <cof> disgraced peado with 56 bvideos of cartoons in his summer house...need i say more<cof>

[RabidPlatypus]

what's the point in comparing it to halo? Many games have already surprassed it....

[TeamR]

Really.....Who cares?

I'm getting tired of hearing Halo around here. These two games are barely competing with each other. Halo is pushing limits on the console side, and Planetside is pushing limits on the PC side (which instantly makes it better ). If you want to play a really cool FPS, go buy halo or halo2 when its released. If you want to play a revolutionary one-of-a-kind title, get Planetside.

This is the Planetside community. Take your Halo shit somewhere else. That also goes for WW2ol, Everquest, SWG, CS, and most definitly TRIBES

[HotDogTommy]

I'm still not sure how anyone can compare a normal TV with a computer monitor. I have an xbox and EVERYTHING looks better on my PC.

And, incidntally, I don't see how PS is pushing the limits of PC technology (correct me if I'm wrong here) , since the requirements are only a 1 gig processor and a 56k modem.

[TeamR]

Originally posted by HotDogTommy
I'm still not sure how anyone can compare a normal TV with a computer monitor. I have an xbox and EVERYTHING looks better on my PC.

And, incidntally, I don't see how PS is pushing the limits of PC technology (correct me if I'm wrong here) , since the requirements are only a 1 gig processor and a 56k modem.

technology is not limited to graphics, friend.

[JohnClark]

Originally posted by HotDogTommy
I'm still not sure how anyone can compare a normal TV with a computer monitor. I have an xbox and EVERYTHING looks better on my PC.

And, incidntally, I don't see how PS is pushing the limits of PC technology (correct me if I'm wrong here) , since the requirements are only a 1 gig processor and a 56k modem.

And also because most games have minimum specs far lower than that.

[Ouroboros]

From what I got out of the Gamespot videos, the graphics of PS is really nice... Screenshots do the game no credit.

[Format]

Dont forget that things are still being done to improve the graphics. They still have things to touch up, though they probably wont be drastic changes. Anyways, the graphics arent the most important thing in a game.

[Camping Carl]

This is the Planetside community. Take your Halo shit somewhere else. That also goes for WW2ol, Everquest, SWG, CS, and most definitly TRIBES

[FraBaktos]

I didn't even like Halo... the auto aim was too much for me. But the graphics were good.