Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Hamma is so going to ban Google for the SWG and other RPG ads.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2012-05-10, 11:59 AM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Colonel
|
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...0_Direct_Cu_II
- Cheaper than the 7970/680 - As powerful as the 7970 and practically as good as the 680 - More energy efficient than the 680/7970 - Probably more powerful in SLI than a 690 and cheaper in doing so. Notice the sound-levels for ASUS' Direct CU II cooler and then realize it's not 3 slots, like it usually is. The "stock overclock" also seems to have pushed it's performance beyond that of the 7970/680. Update: So 670s in SLI are 1-2% less powerful than a 690, use more power than a 690, but cost about $200 less than a 690. Last edited by Vancha; 2012-05-10 at 11:48 PM. |
||
|
2012-05-10, 01:15 PM | [Ignore Me] #3 | ||
Great card. I'll probably be recommending this to most builds here if people can afford. Personally my 560 Ti is all I need at the moment. I likely won't consider a upgrade till big Kepler (GK110) or AMD's next gen product.
__________________
SS89Goku - NC - BR33 - CR5||LFO? Want help upgrading/building a new computer? Will your desktop/laptop run PS2? How PhysX runs on Nvidia and AMD (ATI) systems PlanetSide Universe Rules |
|||
|
2012-05-10, 01:25 PM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
Yeah, for those looking to spend in the 1k with some flexibility range this should be on the list.
This completely nullifies almost all the reason for the top-end AMD cards' existences at their current price points. Hell, even if you have the budget for a 680 or 690, why bother? I almost wish I toughed it out with the 275 for another 6 months.
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
2012-05-12, 12:31 AM | [Ignore Me] #10 | ||
Seriously eyeing this guy to replace my 5770, too (especially if I find out that PhysX adds some nice candy to PS2.
__________________
Doctors kill people one at a time. Engineers do it in batches. Interior Crocodile Aviator IronFist After Dark |
|||
|
2012-05-12, 01:07 AM | [Ignore Me] #11 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
Its still 10-15% slower if you OC a 680 to the same extent, pretty much the same as 570 vs 580. Yeah its an awesome card when its OC'd getting it to the levels of a stock 680, but thats stock 680, OC'n it will jump it right back out there.
So basically its still about what you want to spend, OC'd 670 is a better deal than stock 680, but still a clear loser to an OC'd 680. Keep in mind that these OC'd cards with their better cooling systems add cost to the cards. So its not the full 100 dollar difference but since the OC'd 670 is fairing so well, its still a better deal vs stock 680 if you, again, cant afford the OC'd 680.
__________________
Waiting for the return of the superior, real PS style teamwork oriented vehicles with drivers not gunning, and in fixed vehicle slots so we can once again have real, epic, vehicle battles where the tanks actually move in combat rather than a silly 1700's era line up and shoot. |
||
|
2012-05-12, 02:33 AM | [Ignore Me] #12 | ||
I don't feel like blowing $500+ on a single upgrade (particularly on one that isn't available right now). In my mind, spending $400 now so I can build an entirely new rig a year from now is more reasonable.
__________________
Doctors kill people one at a time. Engineers do it in batches. Interior Crocodile Aviator IronFist After Dark |
|||
|
2012-05-12, 09:04 PM | [Ignore Me] #13 | |||
First Sergeant
|
|
|||
|
2012-05-13, 10:27 PM | [Ignore Me] #14 | ||
While I agree, I went with EVGA 670 GTX because of the Precision X software and the ability to StepUp to a new card in 90 days if I'd like. I'm curious how the performance between the 670 and 680 will be once the 680 actually has updated drivers.
__________________
|
|||
|
2012-05-14, 11:50 AM | [Ignore Me] #15 | ||
The 670 is simply a binned 680 with one faulty and disabled unit (hell, later down the line when they're getting better yield, it might simply be a disabled unit), they didn't even cut the memory bus down this time, so I'd expect most improvements for the 680 to have a proportional effect on the 670 as well.
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|