Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: I didn't know they could reject these!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2012-06-30, 07:08 AM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Private
|
Check this footage: 0:51:30 0:56:33 1:08:50 landed reaver looks totally unnatural, like it just deny the laws of physics, devs just cant be serious with this type of design, first iteration of reaver where far more pleasing to the eye with its tail pointed down(it make sense for the landing purposes), i really hope they change it somehow... Last edited by Ainte; 2012-06-30 at 07:09 AM. |
||
|
2012-06-30, 07:21 AM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
Master Sergeant
|
I actually agree with Ainte, it doesn't look right. While the tail of the Reaver is indeed thin, that's not really where the problem lies. If you look closely, the bulk of the reaver actually looks to be behind the cockpit.
This feels a bit more realistic, in my uneducated opinion. |
||
|
2012-06-30, 07:23 AM | [Ignore Me] #5 | ||
what do you expect from NC engineers
"Do you think we should make this thing stable to land on?" "Nah, chances are none will make it back for a safe landing so I wouldn't bother" "Fair enough" lol
__________________
"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war, and now there ain't no going back. I mean shit, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it! If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight. " Slim Charles aka Tallman - The Wire BRTD Mumble Server powered by Gamercomms |
|||
|
2012-06-30, 07:30 AM | [Ignore Me] #6 | ||
Historical fact
__________________
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature *Disclaimer: When participating in a discussion I do not do so in the capacity of a semidivine moderator. Feel free to disagree with any of my opinions.
|
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|