Differentiating rifle type weapons - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: Trying to eat you since the dev met the T-Virus!
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2012-07-01, 12:04 PM   [Ignore Me] #1
Galapogos
Corporal
 
Differentiating rifle type weapons


After watching all the E3 footage we saw a lot of people playing the light and heavy assault classes, and a little of the medic and engy of I remember corretcly. This means we at least saw a lot of carbines and LMGs. The thing is I did not see a huge difference between the two in how they handled. I would like to see the rifle type weapons (SMGs, Carbines, full sized ARs, and LMGs) have significant differences in how they handle and also what situations each is the most effective in, or at least how they can be used to approach the same situation from a different angle. I didn't mention sniper rifles since they obviously already have a very defined role.

A very simple solution to me would be to restrict ARs to single/3 round burst and the rest to full auto/3 round burst, but I don't think that would differentiate them enough, even though I am sure there will be differences in rof, dps, etc. as well obviously.

How do you guys think these weapons should be varied so they have clear differences in performance and function?
Galapogos is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 12:19 PM   [Ignore Me] #2
TerranRoughneck
Private
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


It's my experience that the weapons are broken down like this:

SMGs: High rate of fire, lower accuracy, quick reload, short to medium range
ARs: Medium rate of fire, higher accuracy, medium reload, medium to long range
LMGs: Low-high rate of fire(varies depending), lower accuracy, long reload, medium to long range.

It just depends on your play style. If you like being up close and personal, SMGs are great. If you like taking being relatively versatile and accurate regardless of the range then go with ARs. LMGs are typically just good for support, laying down covering fire or when defending.

Of course, you'll be able to change anything and everything about your gun via the cert system. So it really just depends on what weapons system and style you prefer; then you can mold it to your play style.
TerranRoughneck is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 12:26 PM   [Ignore Me] #3
AxeGaijin
Private
 
AxeGaijin's Avatar
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


What we've seen on E3, I'm sure, is in no way representative of what will happen in Beta or the full game, I think it's a case of wait and see before making a case one way or another right now.
AxeGaijin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 12:27 PM   [Ignore Me] #4
Galapogos
Corporal
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


I understand the basic differences between these weapons, I just feel like in a lot of games they blur into each to much so that SMgs and ARs/carbines do not feel all that different, and in any game I have played with LMGs, LMGs just become over powered ARs.
Galapogos is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 12:41 PM   [Ignore Me] #5
TerranRoughneck
Private
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


Fair enough, and you're definitely right about them blending together. I think that's because the main differences are too easily altered to be like one or the other. Even in real weapons systems you see a CQC, LMG and AR versions of the same rifle(like the G36, among many others).

If the cert system is as robust as it seems, then there really won't be much of a difference because it'll be up to us to "spec" our guns to work the way we want them to.
TerranRoughneck is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 02:11 PM   [Ignore Me] #6
Littleman
First Lieutenant
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


I'm sure to some degree SMG's will be strictly SMG's, and no carbine, rifle, or LMG can match them, but for the most part it's a power balancing act. Light assault simply can't have TOO accurate weaponry with too much power or rate of fire behind each shot. Hit-n-run is encouraged, not camping and ghetto sniping. They're hard targets to chase, but they shouldn't be firing from ideal vantage points with impunity. Maximum damage output might encourage getting in close, using the pack to out maneuver an enemy more so than get a vantage point over them.

The HA puts a LOT of ammo down range. I expect that if one bursts, the LMG can easily match any rifle, but going full auto would serve more of a suppressing function where as rifles and carbines are likely more manageable with sustained fire (but still largely wasteful.)

Between the classes themselves and even small, seemingly inconsequential differences between the weaponry, I think we'll find they will all act very differently from one another.
Littleman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 02:49 PM   [Ignore Me] #7
CutterJohn
Colonel
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


Originally Posted by Littleman View Post
I expect that if one bursts, the LMG can easily match any rifle, but going full auto would serve more of a suppressing function where as rifles and carbines are likely more manageable with sustained fire (but still largely wasteful.)
Thats backwards. LMGs are the ones built for sustained fire. Rifles and carbines are lighter, and hence have higher recoil and are more difficult to control.
CutterJohn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 03:57 PM   [Ignore Me] #8
Littleman
First Lieutenant
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


Originally Posted by CutterJohn View Post
Thats backwards. LMGs are the ones built for sustained fire. Rifles and carbines are lighter, and hence have higher recoil and are more difficult to control.
Didn't realize Planetside 2 was being developed with ultra-realism in mind.

It's not backwards in terms of Planetside 2. It's called balance. I don't recall reading that the LMG's were accurate under sustained fire.
Littleman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 04:01 PM   [Ignore Me] #9
gufftroad
Corporal
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


Originally Posted by Littleman View Post
Didn't realize Planetside 2 was being developed with ultra-realism in mind.

Ergo, probably not backwards in terms of Planetside 2. It's called balance.
LMGs have always been for sustained suppressing fire even in BF3 that's what they are meant for

you don't go full retard unless you are laying down suppressing fire with an assault rifle you use burst or semi for clearing and close range to make your shots count
gufftroad is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 04:05 PM   [Ignore Me] #10
Seagoon
Corporal
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


Originally Posted by Littleman View Post
Didn't realize Planetside 2 was being developed with ultra-realism in mind.

It's not backwards in terms of Planetside 2. It's called balance. I don't recall reading that the LMG's were accurate under sustained fire.
Dev A: "Ok we are going to have two sorts of cutlery, a knife and a fork."
Dev B: "But they are both spoons..."
Dev A: "Planetside 2 is not being developed with ultra-realism in mind."
Dev B: "Oh, I guess that makes sense then."
Seagoon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 04:09 PM   [Ignore Me] #11
gufftroad
Corporal
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


Originally Posted by Seagoon View Post
Dev A: "Ok we are going to have two sorts of cutlery, a knife and a fork."
Dev B: "But they are both spoons..."
Dev A: "Planetside 2 is not being developed with ultra-realism in mind."
Dev B: "Oh, I guess that makes sense then."
exactly
gufftroad is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 04:11 PM   [Ignore Me] #12
Littleman
First Lieutenant
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


Okay... everyone shut the **** up for two seconds:

You're taking what I say to the extreme. Work on your reading comprehension.

I never said rifles were pinpoint accurate at full auto. I said they'd likely be MORE accurate than the LMG at full auto. I also went on to say it's still a waste of bullets to full auto regardless. Still don't understand? Let me spell it out for you:

You're still a ****-tard if you full auto with either an LMG or a rifle. Rifles may just have a tighter maximum spread.

But $#!%, take my speculation as though I'm speaking fact, then counter with your own beliefs, also mistaken as fact (in regards to PS2.) Have you played Planetside 2 yet? I certainly haven't!
Littleman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 04:18 PM   [Ignore Me] #13
gufftroad
Corporal
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


full auto is what you are supposed to do with an LMG its meant to keep people suppressed so your squad can advance without having to worry about return fire its not a precision instrument and of course the LMG would have more recoil its shooting full auto

Last edited by gufftroad; 2012-07-01 at 04:19 PM.
gufftroad is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 04:30 PM   [Ignore Me] #14
Littleman
First Lieutenant
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


Originally Posted by gufftroad View Post
full auto is what you are supposed to do with an LMG its meant to keep people suppressed so your squad can advance without having to worry about return fire its not a precision instrument and of course the LMG would have more recoil its shooting full auto
I don't care WHAT the hell it's called in PS2. We A: Don't know how they'll really work yet and B: Do you REALLY think laying down suppressive fire is what most HA will do if they can pull off accurate shots using burst fire? Finally, C: How popular do you really think the Heavy Assault class will be if it has no med-long range killing capabilities like we'd expect from the Medic and Engineer? Only team players are interested in using a weapon for suppression, and even most of THEM prefer to kill people outright.

I know SOE is taking inspiration from Battlefield, but they sure as hell ain't making a carbon copy of it. Since last I heard HA will get the LMG and then either a choice of AV or HA as we may have recognized them in PS1, I'm pretty damned sure the LMG is mostly a really big rifle in PS2, just less accurate but not so much so one may as well use a mini-gun at all of the same ranges.
Littleman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 05:06 PM   [Ignore Me] #15
Goku
Contributor
PSU Moderator
 
Goku's Avatar
 
Re: Differentiating rifle type weapons


Lets calm down a bit everyone.
Goku is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29 PM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.