IR/NV - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: Pwned. Since 2002.
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2013-01-11, 08:53 AM   [Ignore Me] #1
Towe
Private
 
IR/NV


What is this bullshit with IR and NV working perfectly during day, even showing enemies much better than normal sights?

Imo there should be almost no contrast on NV during the day, IR could get a LITTLE more contrast but shouldnt be able to see terrain.

Just a quick thought about how to solve this, I would be fine with almost everything that made it a stupid move to use those in daylight.

Oh yea, and make night last a bit longer, otherwise it might not be worth it switching to IR/NV. Maybe a longer night on Amerish and a shorter one on Indar? Just a thought, discuss...

EDIT: I thought everybody new, but seems not so I have to edit this in:
Dont forget that there is vehicle IR/NV. While infantry often gives up zoom, vehicles do that much less since they cant get much zoom anyway. Also for alot of vehicles it would be much harder to detect infantry without using IR/NV.

Last edited by Towe; 2013-01-16 at 01:46 PM.
Towe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 09:13 AM   [Ignore Me] #2
ringring
Contributor
General
 
Re: IR/NV


No.

I use NV pretty much all the time. Why? To be able to see.

Day/night is ok as it is.
__________________
ringring is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 09:22 AM   [Ignore Me] #3
Sledgecrushr
Colonel
 
Re: IR/NV


Ir nv for both vehicles and infantry needs a big nerf. Its too much of an ez mode. Its just stupid op on vehicles, you dont really have to look to be able to discern every infantry and vehicle within sight. For infantry you can pick out cloaked infiltrators too easily and it works great through smoke, daylight and almost everything else that you can throw at it. These nightvision add ons need to be fixed so the other sughts would be just as useful.
Sledgecrushr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 09:45 AM   [Ignore Me] #4
OnyxD
Private
 
OnyxD's Avatar
 
Re: IR/NV


To be fair, on infantry guns IRNV does have it's drawbacks as well. It doesn't have a zoom and really cuts down on peripheral vision. It also can take time to get used to the sudden switch of colour scheme.

Having said that IRNV is my favourite scope.
OnyxD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 10:03 AM   [Ignore Me] #5
Assist
Contributor
Major
 
Re: IR/NV


Originally Posted by Sledgecrushr View Post
Ir nv for both vehicles and infantry needs a big nerf. Its too much of an ez mode. Its just stupid op on vehicles, you dont really have to look to be able to discern every infantry and vehicle within sight. For infantry you can pick out cloaked infiltrators too easily and it works great through smoke, daylight and almost everything else that you can throw at it. These nightvision add ons need to be fixed so the other sughts would be just as useful.
Agreed completely. I use IRNV on every weapon and/or vehicle that I can. The only weapons I don't have it on are the beamer and long range sniper.

It's too good to not use right now, hopefully it gets changed. Although to be honest, the main reason I use it is the muzzle flash from the guns is extremely distracting for me, to the point that my aim is horrible without the IRNV.
__________________
Assist is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 10:06 AM   [Ignore Me] #6
Sturmhardt
Contributor
Major
 
Sturmhardt's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by ringring View Post
No.

I use NV pretty much all the time. Why? To be able to see.

Day/night is ok as it is.
You are part of the problem.

.sent via phone.
__________________
Sturmhardt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 10:15 AM   [Ignore Me] #7
Mavvvy
Corporal
 
Re: IR/NV


The infrared certainly is borked, passive infrared nightvision should not be highlighting units as it does. While thermal seem's to me that its working as it should be, plus it seems to have a shorter range then rendering distance which seems balanced to me.

Besides its not like your visible if someone keeps spamming a button in your rough direction..grrrr...
Mavvvy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 10:19 AM   [Ignore Me] #8
NewSith
Contributor
Brigadier General
 
NewSith's Avatar
 
Re: IR/NV


It's not as good long range as everyone thinks. It's either IRNV or Zoom and since not everyone is able to do precision shooting, I think it balances itself out.
__________________

Originally Posted by CutterJohn View Post
Shields.. these are a decent compromise between the console jockeys that want recharging health, and the glorious pc gaming master race that generally doesn't.
NewSith is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 10:25 AM   [Ignore Me] #9
SeraphC
Sergeant
 
Re: IR/NV


IR should not be handicapped during daytimes, you should see just as well as you normally do. IR shouldn't highlight stuff though (not if you want it realistically).

That being said I like IR the way it is. (I am part of the problem!) It would be a bit to hard to see anything on the ground without sticking your nose up it's ass in aircraft if it weren't available.
SeraphC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 10:28 AM   [Ignore Me] #10
belch
Contributor
First Sergeant
 
belch's Avatar
 
Re: IR/NV


For a minute I thought I had stumbled into the BF3 forums...

Having jumped into a Lib that was setup with IRNV on the Zephyr, I have to say it seemed excessivley good. Maybe make a suit ability that can counter the effects?
belch is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 10:43 AM   [Ignore Me] #11
Baneblade
Contributor
Lieutenant General
 
Baneblade's Avatar
 
Re: IR/NV


I think Intercoolers should be a certable upgrade that hides your heat signature. At the cost of whatever defensive ability you don't have.

But at least we don't have IR goggles...those would be much more massively OP.
__________________
Post at me bro.

Baneblade is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 11:28 AM   [Ignore Me] #12
Rolfski
Major
 
Rolfski's Avatar
 
Re: IR/NV


They already have their limits so instead of nerfing them I would rather have an option to counter them. Wearing some sort of anti-thermal armor would make it difficult to be spotted by these optics. The trade-off being that it requires a suit slot that could be used for other useful armors.
Rolfski is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 11:55 AM   [Ignore Me] #13
IamEternal
Private
 
Re: IR/NV


As an Infiltrator, I hate these. Cloaking is pointless. There should be a cert with the cloaking that eliminates it when the cloak is activated.
IamEternal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 01:09 PM   [Ignore Me] #14
sneeek
Private
 
Re: IR/NV


It's a bit illogical that an infiltrator's cloak works only for light of optical frequencies. Infrared is just a different band of frequencies compared to optical.

Here's an evil, money-grabbing idea for SOE: have an extortionately-priced cert (or cert chain) that upgrades the cloak to include infrared cloaking, or at least, better infrared cloaking. Call it wideband cloak, or something. Make it mutually exclusive with sound-reducing certs, so that you can either be very silent, or very cloaked.

Last edited by sneeek; 2013-01-11 at 01:13 PM.
sneeek is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-11, 01:25 PM   [Ignore Me] #15
Sledgecrushr
Colonel
 
Re: IR/NV


Infrared optics work by using an infrared flashlight. This stuff should both be super short ranged and the guy who is using it should be lit up to everyone else using ir. Thermal is a completely different animal.
Sledgecrushr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.