Grade this game from 1 to 10

[Krogen]

Haven't played it yet, but I think that's what I will give it after playing. I'll get this game today and I'll post a new message in a couple of days with a new score.

[1024]

It's a great game, hands down. THe only problem is, the devs released the game before it was done. IT seems like they're making everyone pay for beta right now...


But nevertheless, this game kicks ass

[Strygun]

I'm going to give it a 9 as opposed to a 10 only because there are still a few bugs to be worked out. I think the game is a great one; infact, I'd rate it higher than EQ. The gameply, design, and concept is amazing and I congratulate the dev team on it.

However; there are things about the game that need to be worked on. Right now there is a large crash bug which I'm sure is being fixed as I type this, but there are also a few other minor things that could be added/removed to make gameply more exciting. Of course, with any game anyone plays, everyone will have their own opinion. What I want in/out may not be what the devs want, and I just have to live with that.

My .02 cents...


(haha this turned into a thread where I inadvertantly took out my anger at all the whiners on the official forums.. go me )

[MrVulcan]

9, would be 10, but still crash from time to time, and there is still a lack of deabth in some areas (those problems should go away with time though)

So, my guess in about 4 months it will be a 10, for now, its just a 9

[Dantiel]

A game that locks your entire computer gets a gd 1 rating from me.

[�io]

8 right now to do bugs. In a few weeks(hopefully) it will be pretty stable and shit so it will be a 9-9�.

[Lise]

I'd give it an 8. Like a friend of mine pointed out, it's got a few problems with things like base variety and reasons for fighting far from bases (my squad went on an AMS chase earlier today, it was COOL ^_^ ) and we've got the CTD issues... but the basic gameplay is good stuff. I'll be playing for a while yet, I bet.

[IDgaf]

5.

Am reticent to give it more because I spend a lot of time thinking 'they should do this' instead of 'bloody hell, that was good!'.

[1024]

Originally posted by IDgaf
5.

Am reticent to give it more because I spend a lot of time thinking 'they should do this' instead of 'bloody hell, that was good!'.

Well a lot of the things people think up have balance flaws in them. Post up your ideas, im sure someone will point out someting wrong with them, its weird that way

Originally posted by �io
...it will be pretty stable and shit...

Is that a technical term, Dio?

[Krogen]

BUMP

[Doppler]

on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 implies perfection which no game willl ever reach in suplicity, elegance design stability, and replay value.

[RUEN]

what about Shining Force II?

[IDgaf]

A more accurate representation of what I think would be 'why don't they'...

give incentive to defend

reward people to fight together

give incentive to fight outside of bases

reduce COF

make grenades kill people

change design of bases


...essentially what everyone is asking about.

[1024]

You have to give the devs some time. They hear all the requests, which some have bugs built into them(for instance if nade's kileld people the punisher would own everyone), but they are doing other things as well. For instance, this "lock up" issue: im sure the devs are owrkign on this as wetalk(err...type ).

Jut give the devs some time to work, they can only do so much at once.

[BlakkyZ8]

I like the CoF... None of those damn "1337 5n1p3r5" that take advantage of pixel to pixel aim.