| Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
|
 |
PSU: Just because I have a short attention span doesn't mean that I
| Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
|
|
2004-04-04, 10:21 PM
|
[Ignore Me] #2 | ||
|
Contributor Major
|
No More Aircraft!
__________________
The courageous man needs needs no weapons. The practical man wants them all. The ambitious man has plans for the practical one. Doppler/Galgimp-J/Hardcased Lord give me strength of arm, will, mind, and the accuracy of shooting to preserve them all. |
||
|
|
|
2004-04-05, 12:48 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #5 | ||
|
Hell no the reaver shoudl stay the same but a two person AA jet(not heilo) would be cool, and ofcourse it would be faster than the reaver, and it shoudl e faster thant the skeeter but not much
__________________
 All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
|
|
|
2004-04-05, 02:20 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #6 | ||
|
i say forget the groundlings completely. they're only cannon fodder anyway. let's have a complete working aircraft fleet - we already have the scout, bomber, chopper, and a couple transports... now we need interceptors, gunships, fighters, and amphibs.
__________________
-martyr |
|||
|
|
|
|
2004-04-05, 02:32 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #7 | ||
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
I wouldn't mind a speedy, lightly armored, completely weaponless spy jet that could provide extensive radar coverage of a batttlefield. That said, the Mossy could then become the bona fide anti-air aircraft of PS, armed with a small cache of guided missiles or such.
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
2004-04-05, 12:56 PM
|
[Ignore Me] #11 | |||
|
Major
|
now back on topic, If they were common pool fine I'm al for it, Personally I wouldn't mind seeing an BlackHawk type air craft. the thing that everyone is calling the "AirDel" Not much bigger the a Lib and much smaller then a Gal 3 gunners 2 side 20mm and one 25mm in the rear. 6 spots for infantry (including pilot). so on so forth. |
|||
|
|
|
|
2004-04-05, 01:35 PM
|
[Ignore Me] #13 | ||
|
Corporal
|
ok here is the deal... one why would you want a jet when you can have a VTOL thats just as usfull? two due to bad net code you cant have somthing going faster than the mos. or you will have a warping aircraft... not fun... though i like the idea of a two maned air craft... how about they make one just for killing tanks and it must have two people to man it.. one to fire the guns and pilot and the the other for traking targets, WP, and to fire the rockets
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
2004-04-05, 03:02 PM
|
[Ignore Me] #14 | ||
|
Contributor Lieutenant General
|
Personally I think the Lib should have been a gunship and not a bomber...
Move the pilot to the bombardier spot and keep the 35mm where it is. Put a 25mm ball turret in the front with as much range of motion up as down. Keep the rear ball turret as is (has to have a weakness somewhere). Add another gunner between the pilot and the nose gunner, who has control of Phoenix style guided missiles with Decimator damage and 100m more range... Keep it with the Lib's armor and speed and you got yerself a bonafide gunship... Call it the Devastator... 
__________________
Post at me bro.  |
||
|
|
|
 |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
= Crack addict
Linear Mode
