Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: A CR5 on global is like a 5 year old who's high on sugar
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2007-02-18, 02:10 PM | [Ignore Me] #6 | |||
Lieutenant General
|
While we're at it, we can talk about system stability and security as well, I'm sure that would win many more people for the PC cause. And before someone says it, Vista does not have security. If you honestly beleive that then you're a crackpot. Vista has a scape-goat program microsoft that lets the company say "Oh, well we put the security in there, its not our fault you had to turn it off because it kept asking you if you really wanted to turn your computer on."
__________________
Last edited by Infernus; 2007-02-18 at 02:13 PM. |
|||
|
2007-02-18, 02:24 PM | [Ignore Me] #7 | ||
You know what I like best about PC's?
They don't come with a container ship of Ego.
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. Last edited by Rbstr; 2007-02-18 at 06:35 PM. |
|||
|
2007-02-18, 04:16 PM | [Ignore Me] #8 | ||
PSU Admin
|
here here
Infernus you can try all you want but Mac's still do not beat PC's in gaming. Sure you can play - but the average gamer doesn't want to jump through 30-50 hoops just to load their favorite game. Add on top of that they are paying in some cases double what they would pay for a PC. Then you've got all sorts of apps and emulators running in the background who knows what that does for performance. If Macs were as popular as Windows and PC they would have just as many if not more holes being probed by hackers. People don't like windows so they create viruses and seek holes. The same would be true if Macs were in the PC's boat. With great distribution comes great criticism. PC's are still better than Mac's at 90***37; of what is out there, mac's have their niche still and that remains in video editing and graphic artists. But it will be a loooong time if ever before Mac's come anywhere near PC's in general usefulness. I work with both all the time - and I would still take a PC over a Mac any day. Those commercials are still dumb though. |
||
|
2007-02-18, 06:52 PM | [Ignore Me] #9 | ||
Really, I'm neutral in this.
I prefer a PC because I like having a bit more control, and I don't want to fiddle with compatibility(I need CAD and stuff). I also really hate itunes, and single button mice. Macs are really great for people that just need a computer to surf the web and type. That's good for alot of people. Especialy those are often people that are mostly concerned with how thier computer/mp3player/laptop looks. They really do appeal to our vain side. Macs and PC's use the same hardware now, so there is no huge performance gap in anything, the virtual machines work very well(because they don't have to emulate a hardware instruction set) so it's not hard to run your windows programs, but they cost extra bucks. I'm not gonna spend the extra bucks. Windows isn't that secure, but Mac, like linux (it's the same as the FF vs. IE battle) is mainly secure though obscurity. The best security is always a user that knows what the fuck he's doing.
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
2007-02-21, 04:42 PM | [Ignore Me] #12 | ||
Contributor Major General
|
Ive played around with OS X several times; Im thinking about getting a standard Macbook as my senior graduation present. 2 Ghz C2D, 2GB of RAM, 120 GB HDD.
I dont really need the Macbook Pro; I would only be pretending to play games in Windows. The underclocked 128mb X1600 is a joke. Good College laptop, that (hopefully) but the time my folks order it Leopard will be out and the Intel GMA 950 can run Vista. |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|