Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: It's like shooting rats in a bucket.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2012-06-15, 08:41 AM | [Ignore Me] #167 | ||
First Sergeant
|
Ok, here is why I chose NC. Primarily I will be playing as a sniper, and a pilot. And when I say sniper, I mean sniping, not the CoD version of it which could be more accurately described as combat marksmen or CQ marksmen.
1. (TR) Quick fire, low damage shots are not tactically viable for a sniper. As the more shots you have to fire, the longer it takes to take an enemy down giving them time to take cover or at the very least react. More bullets also mean a severe increase in change of being spotted, as one bullet can catch you off guard, but as you pump out loads the enemy has the time to see where the bullets are coming from. 2. (VS) Medium damage portrays the same thing, especially when the shots get weaker over larger distances and the shot itself is far brighter. The only thing that is advantageous about VS weaponry is its slight increase in damage about the TR, and the fact that there is no bullet drop. But at the end of the day I would rather miss my target due to bullet drop and not be detected so I can move to another position and try again, than being able to hit the enemy but giving away my position, eliminating my advantage as a sniper. So the obvious choice is to go for the NC as they have a far more powerful rifle which conveys more bonuses than just it's damage. Besides, I have a thing for bolt action rifles, I love to pace myself. Now when it comes to piloting, VS or TR would actually be preferable for the interceptor role, but more often than not I take the air-to-ground role when in an aircraft which is capable of hovering and has missile pods, so power then becomes an advantage over speed when your job is to overwhelm an area. Having said all of this it is an extremely hard choice to make for me. It is a shame VS look very anime, I happen to like purple, and the scythe. Last edited by MrKWalmsley; 2012-06-15 at 08:50 AM. |
||
|
2012-06-15, 09:14 AM | [Ignore Me] #168 | ||
First Sergeant
|
I too like the 'more powerful, less shots' paradigm, but how viable it will be for non-sniping for me will depend on how much latency/lag I experience, I expect.
I have a feeling I would have more fun with the vehicles and scythe than with infantry stuff, except I haven't got a joystick and so may not be able to compete with anyone that does in air battles. I suppose we'll see (or I may buy a wired xbox controller, because I think two sticks is pretty much perfect for controlling planes/fighters/etc, as long as the controls are configurable). So I'm torn between NC "More powerful if you can aim! More armor too! Win-win!" and the VS niftyness (despite ranged damage falloff and very visible weapon effects). Last edited by Trafalgar; 2012-06-15 at 09:17 AM. |
||
|
2012-06-15, 10:39 AM | [Ignore Me] #171 | |||
First Sergeant
|
So basically you can to the best of my knowledge increase TR weapon damage and lower rate of fire but not nearly to the extent of NC weapons. Or you could increase range so bullet drop becomes less of a problem with TR and NC but you will not be able to get rid of bullet drop entirely for those factions. So it is flexibility within the factions own limits to bring them close to each other but not overlapping. Last edited by MrKWalmsley; 2012-06-15 at 10:43 AM. |
|||
|
2012-06-15, 10:41 AM | [Ignore Me] #172 | |||
TR with its underslung gattlinguns rushing into cqc had nothing realistic to me... They are more the pseudo oppressive bad 80s movies evil faction ^^ NC are the only ones that have some reminiscences to real world armies.
__________________
|
||||
|
2012-06-15, 10:52 AM | [Ignore Me] #173 | |||
First Sergeant
|
But back on topic I really do hope that the factions balance out in the actual game, and I hope that NC does not end up being filled with Halo converts seeking this to be their new arcade-y FPS. Last edited by MrKWalmsley; 2012-06-15 at 10:56 AM. |
|||
|
2012-06-15, 11:37 AM | [Ignore Me] #175 | |||
Sergeant
|
|
|||
|
2012-06-15, 11:45 AM | [Ignore Me] #178 | ||
Sergeant
|
I agree with you I would rather be on the side with less numbers so I have a better chance to kill someone. But i don't think I will have that problem in PS2. I am sure it will always be pop locked with all three factions even if NC don't have the numbers. Unless you play on a newer server. But the first servers will be packed to the hilt. I am not worried.
|
||
|
2012-06-15, 11:48 AM | [Ignore Me] #179 | ||
First Sergeant
|
How very militaristic of you... infact while we are on the subject I find it weird that the TR being the most militaristic of groups would be the one who favours spray and pray, low damage and fast fire crappy old fashioned weapons and preferring to skit around with hardly any armour when that seems to be insurgency tactics! And yet the insurgency faction uses accurate high powered and advanced weapons and uses heavy armour. Very strange if you ask me. If only TR actually were what they are supposed to be maybe my militaristic side wouldn't be calling me to NC.
Last edited by MrKWalmsley; 2012-06-15 at 11:49 AM. |
||
|
2012-06-15, 11:49 AM | [Ignore Me] #180 | ||
First Sergeant
|
I would not be surprised to find a sizable number of NC players and potential NC players who were unwilling to use Facebook. Obviously, there is no proof, but neither is the facebook app in any way a realistic representative sample of prospective Planetside 2 players.
|
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|