Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: What do you mean we can't be friends?!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
2012-12-12, 05:50 AM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Master Sergeant
|
Infiltrators have EMP nades but they are very weak. They disable infantry's weapons, shields and HUD for few seconds, and they possibly disable vehicle weapons (I know my squad was complaining I EMP-d ours and theirs Sundy and nobody was able to shoot) but the duration is so short it's not really worth it.
If it were permanent (until repaired), then we would be talking about useful. Especially if EMP nades would disable the vehicle entirely (weapons, engines, abilities) they might even be worth 200 certs. As regards to HE rounds, they are fine IMO. The player using them bought them (with smedbux or certs) and are weaker against vehicles than HEAT or AP rounds but better against infantry. |
||
|
2012-12-12, 06:18 AM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||||
Lieutenant General
|
What was the duration? PS1 was around 10-15seconds (ample time) on vehicles and what, 30 seconds on infantry + reset implants lasted up to a minute due to their charge times. Should be an available tool for all infantry though. If anything it's a last ditch defense to get away.
Hence HEAT Lightning takes significantly more skill to use with its six shots, even if the rof is a little bit high IMO. Would rather have a bigger clip and slightly lower rof. |
||||
|
2012-12-12, 11:33 AM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
Lieutenant General
|
Nah Bobbyshaftoe, good allround player.
I didn't play fishhead. Phoenix was more difficult to pull this off with, hence we would use Decimators for that, or sit behind a tree or hill firing Phoenixes over it from cover (Phoenix was camera guided). |
||
|
2012-12-12, 02:50 AM | [Ignore Me] #10 | ||
Private
|
There's an easy answer to this and it does not require the removal or 'nerfing' of HE rounds.
Stop being sheep and spawning in the same area. Better yet get more Sunderers and have multiple attack routes. Spread the battle line thin over a wider area and stop bunching. Maximize terrain. |
||
|
2012-12-12, 04:00 AM | [Ignore Me] #11 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
Hunting HE Lightnings in my HEAT Lightning is always fun, I love watching their rounds start bouncing harmlessly off me while I pound their tank. And you can always see the suddenly realisation on the part of the other driver that they're screwed, it's when they're down to half health after a couple of hits and start trying to reverse in a panic. Delicious..
..Wait, where was I? Oh right.. Yeah, if we couldn't camp spawns and easily shoot into places like towers, there wouldn't be this problem. They could probably still tweak HE blasts, but spawn/building design are the main issue here (as always). Btw, every time this comes up I wonder why people who know that spamming spawn rooms is an easy mode arsehole move still do it. Why just, you know, not? If you don't find it fun anyway, then you're doing everyone (including yourself) a favour by refusing to do it. Last edited by ShadetheDruid; 2012-12-12 at 04:01 AM. |
||
|
2012-12-12, 04:33 AM | [Ignore Me] #12 | |||
Corporal
|
The next part is not necessarily related to the above but its something which has kinda been hovering in the background of many a thread. That is what is infuriating me a bit at times, balance complaints when the counters are not being used, because everyone wants the route to the quickest skill-points. Probably more of an indicator of the skillpoint mechanic not working more then anyone's fault. Up the reward for tank kills and maybe more people will spec ap tanks. That said it would have been nice if tanks were designed more in a semi-realistic way, ie you unlocked shell types and were limited to say 8 specialist shells of ap and he and could switch between them (keeping a full complement of heat). This in my opinion would have been more balanced. Last edited by Mavvvy; 2012-12-12 at 04:42 AM. |
|||
|
2012-12-12, 06:29 AM | [Ignore Me] #14 | ||
Private
|
I don't agree that they should remove them. That is going to annoy a large number of players including myself who do use them from time to time when the situation calls for it.
With that in mind, the only logical solution I can see is to half their damage to vehicles making it an effective weapon to use against infantry only. Perhaps reduce the area of effect slightly (only slightly). If people want to gimp themselves to farm infantry then they should in no way stand up against armor. Anyone else agree? |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|