Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Dog for sale: eats anything and is fond of children.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2013-08-06, 10:59 AM | [Ignore Me] #16 | |||
Master Sergeant
|
your right about putting the fun away, I don't know if I will be flying after this. If they do give us a cert line for AB tanks, then I will keep flying and kill more noobs easier (All I run right now is AB tanks so no harm, but it will hurt snafu and his rockets as well as making all the new air weapons pointless since they will not be able to compete without the RM.... Having less AB was bad enough imo). If the change goes through, and the cert line on the AB tanks holds true, then my play style will not change and I will keep vortek rotaring down everything. |
|||
|
2013-08-06, 11:02 AM | [Ignore Me] #17 | |||
Master Sergeant
|
|
|||
|
2013-08-15, 10:48 PM | [Ignore Me] #22 | ||
Sergeant Major
|
Well Higby spoke on the vertical thrust changes again. He seems very focused on tying vertical thrust into the fuel tanks. Forcing pilots that want to be competetive to rely on fuel tanks in the future. He also said he was looking for ace pilot's opinions on the matter. I dropped him a tweet offering Connery's top pilots opinions. If he takes me up on it I will be contacting all of the respected top pilots and try and get your thoughts heard.
|
||
|
2013-08-17, 12:54 AM | [Ignore Me] #24 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
Edit: Also would like to add I love how Luperza defended the skill ceiling of PS2. Knowing that the bads were upset by her response makes me a happy person. Last edited by snafus; 2013-08-17 at 02:13 AM. |
|||
|
2013-08-27, 02:07 AM | [Ignore Me] #26 | ||
Private
|
I think the whole vertical thrust maneuver's a piece of shite. And I don't see the big deal in nerfing it. If you rely on a single maneuver in order to distinguish between the 'good' the 'bad' and the liberators... you need to learn to fly.
Stop being ballerinas and learn to dogfight. And nerf the hellfires again, everyone uses them and they're annoying. My dalton kills more retarded mossies than ESF's... the ones trying to farm infantry. You're fighter aircraft, not ground attack gunships. And FFS, give the liberators some love, the only vehicle in-game that hasn't had anything 'good' added to it..... |
||
|
2013-08-27, 01:51 PM | [Ignore Me] #27 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
|
|||
|
2013-08-27, 05:04 PM | [Ignore Me] #28 | |||
Master Sergeant
|
FYI, People refer to the RM as the RM only because the most basic of the maneuver that is pushing yourself upwards at a high speed wile pitching down slightly to keep from going into forward flight is the most basic part, and all other maneuvers build off that despite there being an almost unlimited amount of 'moves' that can be done using that idea alone. Also, since when are ESF A2A only? If I am not mistaken, almost all military aircraft have weapons available to them that make them air to ground. Last edited by SolLeks; 2013-08-27 at 05:10 PM. |
|||
|
2013-08-28, 11:44 PM | [Ignore Me] #29 | ||
Private
|
They wouldn't be classified as a dedicated fighter, you may be thinking of the popular American multi-role fighters such as an f 35, whereas a plane like an a-10 would be CAS. A dedicated fighter such as an f-22 or an su-27 generally do not have ground attack capabilities, because other planes do it better. The terms ESF implies air superiority, just as much as a fighter jet implies air superiority, if they changed the name to Empire Specific Multi Role Fighter it would be more fitting.
As a side note I am against the nerf, just had to clarify to Solleks |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|