Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Batteries not included
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2003-02-17, 10:15 PM | [Ignore Me] #19 | |||
They didn't do an apples to apples test like you might want though. They took an AMD 2800+ in a really damn good board and a p4 3.06 in a really damn good intel board and compared the two. I'm not even sure if they used the same kind of memory or not, but I'm thinking not. I think they just put together two really good machines like someone might buy together and compared the two. The other stuff was all the same I think though (hard drive, case, graphics card, sound card, etc). Basically, in the gaming tests, the AMD either beat or was very very close to the p4 in every category. Don't get me wrong though, in other tests, such as digital video processing and things, the p4 blew it away because of the hyperthreading the p4 has starting with the 3.06 chip. It all boiled down to that for overall performance the p4 won. But for just gaming stuff, the amd was at least as good, if not better, and it was about $400 cheaper at the time of their tests. |
||||
|
2003-02-18, 07:28 AM | [Ignore Me] #23 | ||
The price difference between P4's and AMD's has shrinked alott lately, just did a quick check on my local suppliers website and the average difference was $20 here... I don't think price is such a huge reason to go AMD annymore.
Just that there are so manny people out there who are AMD for lyfe, P4 suxxz0rs when infact Intel has the lead atm for pretty close to the same price. I just want the Hammerchipsets to come out... AMD will be back in buisness then and it'll have a condentender to intels 200Mhz FBS chips thats comming out soon. actual speed will be 800mhz thanks to the quad technology that intel uses... Should be an interesting time for CPU's in the next months =) btw, HT is also comming for more and more games, making the pentiums even better. |
|||
|
2003-02-18, 08:40 AM | [Ignore Me] #24 | |||
Contributor PSU Staff
Code Hound |
__________________
powdahound.com |
|||
|
2003-02-18, 09:07 AM | [Ignore Me] #26 | ||
I'm not bashing AMD.... AMD's get hotter than pentiums and requires more cooling. colder the better ya know.
edit: if you have some CPU's to waste, run a AMD and a pentium chip whitout a cooling fan and see who melts first.... hehe, AMD one will go down first, tho AMD has gotten a hell of alott better whit the temp of their chips but they still run at higher temps than pentiums and need a good fan for cooling. Last edited by Zatrais; 2003-02-18 at 09:11 AM. |
|||
|
2003-02-18, 10:12 AM | [Ignore Me] #27 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
Intel for life. The chipsets that go along with AMDs are incompatable with just too much hardware.
__________________
If you hear a voice within you saying, 'You are not a painter,' then by all means paint boy, and that voice will be silenced. ~ Vincent van Gogh Sit Back, Relax, and Enjoy the Action. |
||
|
2003-02-18, 10:23 AM | [Ignore Me] #28 | ||
really lexington? I have never once had a problem using AMD chipsets EVER. (Granted I started using AMD after my PIII got to old, but arn't we talking about the new ones anyways?)
the new AMD chips have the 333mhz FSB and the price difference is not $20, its more like $35 |
|||
|
2003-02-18, 10:34 AM | [Ignore Me] #29 | ||
New and new, the AMDs still use the socket a... 5 year old technology for their newest chipsets, the bartons.. P4 chips are 400mh or 533mhz FSB whit the next ones at 800mhz.
As for price difference, depends on supplier apperantly... at the online store where i buy the difference was an average of $20. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|