Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: btw... we've been drinking heavily
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2004-08-04, 01:50 PM | [Ignore Me] #16 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
He isn't cutting the taxes for the rich people, he is making them even with poor peoples.
We can't really make an argument on who would be better however until we see how Kerry handles things(If he is elected).
__________________
No Soup For You! Last edited by Hydralisk; 2004-08-04 at 01:51 PM. |
|||
|
2004-08-04, 03:14 PM | [Ignore Me] #17 | |||
__________________
|
||||
|
2004-08-04, 03:58 PM | [Ignore Me] #18 | |||
Colonel
|
Yarr, ignorance ahoy! Find me a plausible, refuted connection with 9/11 and Saddam. Yeah, Saddam was a douchebag, but we put him there. Whups. And as per Saddam gassing his own troops, and us goign to fix it. I could list of several countries that are ruled by tyrants, and have people being opressed constantly. The lack of nuclear weapons/weapons of mass destruction made bush backpedal and say "Um...yeah. We were...Um...LIBERATING the Iraqi's. yeah. Liberating." And even IF Saddam did have WoMD's, there is a very SMALL chance that any of them could make it over here. MIssile guidance/propulsion systems take a lot of people, and a lot of money to run properly. From iraq, a nuke MIGHT be able to hit new York. Maybe. And if Saddam was so intent on killing us all, why didnt he build a reactor core (or easier yet, BUY plutonium from some people) and book a private plane, and blow a dirty bomb in an airport? If He really wanted to, he COULD have blown us up good like. But no. We went to war because there was a tyrannical ruler standing on a big pile of oil. I KNOW that Bush went there over oil. Halliburton would not have gotten a no-contest contract to rebuild it if he hadnt. WoMD's, Liberating Iraqi's was all a pretty cover story to make the public swallow the war without much unrest. And I dont give a frag if I'm wrong. You can debate me all day, and Ill stick to this theory. Yarrr.
__________________
|
|||
|
2004-08-04, 06:22 PM | [Ignore Me] #21 | |||
Colonel
|
Eh wtf? The first war was %100 justifiable.You cant talk peace with terrorists,they retarded losers who think Allah tells them to blow them self up.As for this last war yes,true some of the reasons were a bit wrong and yet Saddam is out of power,Iraq is free in a way and hopefully can be more stable in the coming months.Id rather have Bush who does what NEEDS to be done then Kerry whos gonna kiss everyones ass we hurt ties with,IE the French. Hes gonna totally screw up Iraq and pull out too early and cause that nation to fall under a dictator rule again.
__________________
these are lame |
|||
|
2004-08-04, 06:30 PM | [Ignore Me] #22 | ||
Colonel
|
Yes, Afghanistan was excellent; everybody supported us, the taliban were bad shits, it was the dawn of a glorious era. Iraq: the most fucked over PR evar.
We hurt more nations than the French. We hurt ties with almost all of Europe excluding the UK. Last edited by OfaLoaf; 2004-08-04 at 06:31 PM. |
||
|
2004-08-04, 06:44 PM | [Ignore Me] #23 | ||
Sexy Beast
|
Im still voting none of the above
__________________
Dragonwolves - Recruting Officer If God brings you to it, He will bring you through it. |
||
|
2004-08-04, 06:45 PM | [Ignore Me] #24 | |||
Banned
|
|
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|