Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Because cocaine is an 800 dollar a day habit!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2004-08-29, 10:51 PM | [Ignore Me] #16 | ||
General
|
Of the four aspects of strategic analysis and definition, it is the contingency planning or entailment organizing role that reaches the highest development in Masterminds. Entailing or contingency planning is not an informative activity, rather it is a directive one in which the planner tells others what to do and in what order to do it. As the organizing capabilities the Masterminds increase so does their inclination to take charge of whatever is going on.
It is in their abilities that Masterminds differ from the other Rationals, while in most of their attitudes they are just like the others. However there is one attitude that sets them apart from other Rationals: they tend to be much more self-confident than the rest, having, for obscure reasons, developed a very strong will. They are rather rare, comprising no more than, say, one percent of the population. Being very judicious, decisions come naturally to them; indeed, they can hardly rest until they have things settled, decided, and set. They are the people who are able to formulate coherent and comprehensive contingency plans, hence contingency organizers or "entailers." Masterminds will adopt ideas only if they are useful, which is to say if they work efficiently toward accomplishing the Mastermind's well-defined goals. Natural leaders, Masterminds are not at all eager to take command of projects or groups, preferring to stay in the background until others demonstrate their inability to lead. Once in charge, however, Masterminds are the supreme pragmatists, seeing reality as a crucible for refining their strategies for goal-directed action. In a sense, Masterminds approach reality as they would a giant chess board, always seeking strategies that have a high payoff, and always devising contingency plans in case of error or adversity. To the Mastermind, organizational structure and operational procedures are never arbitrary, never set in concrete, but are quite malleable and can be changed, improved, streamlined. In their drive for efficient action, Masterminds are the most open-minded of all the types. No idea is too far-fetched to be entertained-if it is useful. Masterminds are natural brainstormers, always open to new concepts and, in fact, aggressively seeking them. They are also alert to the consequences of applying new ideas or positions. Theories which cannot be made to work are quickly discarded by the Masterminds. On the other hand, Masterminds can be quite ruthless in implementing effective ideas, seldom counting personal cost in terms of time and energy.
__________________
|
||
|
2004-08-29, 10:53 PM | [Ignore Me] #17 | ||
General
|
INTJ - 67/11/39/1
1% of the total population. One of the Rationals (NT). Usually have original minds and great drive for their own ideas and purposes. In fields that appeal to them, they have a fine power to organize a job and carry it through with or without help. Skeptical, critical, independent, determined, sometimes stubborn. Must learn to yield less important points in order to win the most important. Live their outer life more with thinking, inner one more with intuition. Most individualistic, self-confident, pragmatic and independent of all the types. Logical, critical, decisive, determined, often stubborn. Decisions come very easy. A builder of systems and the applier of theoretical models. Resemble extraverted thinkers in organizing ability and a tendency to ignore the views and feelings of those who don't agree with them. Tend to drive others almost as hard as they drive themselves. Apt to be effective, relentless reorganizers. Can be efficient executives, rich in ideas. Especially known for making their own rules. |
||
|
2004-08-29, 10:54 PM | [Ignore Me] #18 | ||
All of these tests are total bullshit. I had to take these off and on over the course of four years, and I learned how to tell it what it wanted to hear for specific types. I came out as introverted... yeah fucking right. Then I came out extroverted... I've taken variations of the same type of test where it rates you as Driver, Persuader, Maintainer, and Analyzer. My first test came out Persuader, my second test came out Analyzer, and my third one came out Driver.
It's all a matter of knowing what answers it wants for specific types. |
|||
|
2004-08-30, 08:06 AM | [Ignore Me] #22 | |||
Major General
|
DHITB
Oh wait ISTP
__________________
|
|||
|
2004-08-30, 08:24 AM | [Ignore Me] #23 | ||
Lieutenant General
|
Your Type is
WTFC Who The Fuck Cares Strength of the preferences % 13 7 69 42 Qualitative analysis of your type formula You are: -slightly annoyed -easily pissed off -always doubting others -rude Edit: this isn't pointed at anybody I just had to do it |
||
|
2004-08-30, 08:47 AM | [Ignore Me] #24 | ||
Second Lieutenant
|
INTP
infernus is one, look at his except mine is STRONG introvert 1 point more than S in N STRONG thinker STRONG perciever this is based of the real test I took 2 years ago
__________________
+++++DATE: - Jungfrost polar base (Bernheart), 128.M41 |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|