Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: i dont even read these anymore
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
View Poll Results: Should empire swapping be disabled? | |||
Yes, totally disabled. (One empire per server) | 41 | 70.69% | |
Yes, restriced. (2 or 3 Empires per server with a longer waiting period between changing empires) | 11 | 18.97% | |
No, keep it just how it is. | 5 | 8.62% | |
Not sure yet. | 1 | 1.72% | |
Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2004-10-25, 01:16 PM | [Ignore Me] #16 | ||
It will never happen. SOE is a company. A company likes to make $$. They feel that people will outright quit the game than have the flexibility to play with 2 or even 3 empires per server. The "Fun" factor would be weeded out then.
I asked this question during an Ask the Devs night 3 months ago. That was their answer. No locking the servers down to one empire per server.
__________________
Commanding Officer To the next idiot who says the PS2 Devs do not listen: See this Thread |
|||
|
2004-10-25, 03:14 PM | [Ignore Me] #18 | ||
Private
|
Ya, this needs to be brought up again to the devs. Not sure how much leverage the players can have in persuading SOE to change this, but it is obvious that most players agree that there needs to be some change. The fun factor in empire swapping only makes the game fun for people who always want to be on the winning side. I love being on the winning side, but not at the expense of the other players. That is just way too selfish.
|
||
|
2004-10-25, 03:31 PM | [Ignore Me] #20 | ||
Major
|
I seriously don't see why people swap to the winning empire. If I was gonna switch at all it'd be to one of the losing sides! Why? You'd get far more kills (when you and 100 others are aiming at 1 guy, the chance of you killing them are LOW. when you and 10 others are shooting at the same guy, you're drastically more likely to get that kill!) far more xp, and pretty much wherever you go you know you're ognna get action!
__________________
|
||
|
2004-10-25, 04:19 PM | [Ignore Me] #21 | ||
Even if it is a BR5 n00b, who wants to have their asses kicked constantly? They zerg over to the winning empire for 'bragging rights'. Though for those who brag that we took such and such continent away from you really needs to have their hands cut off at the brain stem area. You only hold the continent long enough until your empire needs you to come back and defend stuff. It is then that an opportunistic empire comes through and takes back your continent.
__________________
Commanding Officer To the next idiot who says the PS2 Devs do not listen: See this Thread |
|||
|
2004-10-25, 09:32 PM | [Ignore Me] #22 | ||
Private
|
OK, here's my position. First, the empire swapping genie is out of the bottle, and it's unlikely the devs will reverse that. Second, when I first saw PlanetSide after release, one of the things that kept me from buying it then was the fact you had to pick one side and stick with it or lose all your character progress (however, the bigger issues were that I didn't have the money to pay for a subscription and I had a sucky Internet connection at that time). I actually would like to see the option to play all three empires on one server (since playing VS on Markov is different from playing VS on Emerald is different from playing VS on Werner, and same for the other empires), but a longer switch timer would be ok as well.
-AWOL Joe |
||
|
2004-10-25, 10:19 PM | [Ignore Me] #24 | ||
meh i could care less about more than one empire per server, as i only have my NC on markov, jus tmake the switching punishment worse.
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
2004-10-25, 10:28 PM | [Ignore Me] #25 | ||
Private
|
i think they should be taken out because i noticed when the capitals first came out there was a way to get in with a router (dont know if you can do it) well you would get a friend to go to an empire and get a router and make it to where you can teleport inside then you would hack it and you can get in
|
||
|
2004-10-26, 12:50 AM | [Ignore Me] #26 | ||
Private
|
I don't think nixing the empire swap is even an option now that its out of the bag, but instead I think there should be a much better incentives program. I play TR Markov generally from 1 a.m. to 8 a.m. western time, and I always notice that we have only around 20-25% global population, but no incentives.
And when it does recognize the horrible disadvantage, we get a wopping 1 to 16 hp advantage. Woot! That 16hp will really save my arse when I have two JHs pointed at me every time I spawn!
__________________
RoninShogun: Go through the back door and attack their spawn tubes. If we're quick and aggressive, they'll be helpless. KamiGaijin: Yes, because no one ever expects a sudden penetration of their rear and assault on the reproductive area. |
||
|
2004-10-26, 01:12 AM | [Ignore Me] #27 | ||
Staff Sergeant
|
Pls Devs fior Planetsides sake give us 1 empire only i hate empire hoppers and the ones i see i TK but the game does not let me give enough pain in to them so that they know its wrong.
__________________
My Spelling = Bad My Grammer = Bad Ask if you dont understand |
||
|
2004-10-26, 09:29 AM | [Ignore Me] #28 | ||
Major
|
As long as we are on controversal subjects, what is your opinion on weapons dealers? I like to trade weapons with other empires, then one day a few friends asked me to get them some stuff, and before I knew it I was getting weapons for basically my entire outfit. I plan to trade BFRs as soon as I get the expansion. I currently trade for tanks and HE mostly, but I get a lot of requests for Lancers and specific pistols. What is your opinion of my ventures?
|
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|