Referendum on bail mechanism failure feature - Page 2 - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: have i ever told you that you look sexy in MAX armor
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 1 Discussion

View Poll Results: Do you like the bail mechanism failure feature?
Yes 19 57.58%
No 14 42.42%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2004-12-03, 08:53 PM   [Ignore Me] #16
Baneblade
Contributor
Lieutenant General
 
Baneblade's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by BlackHawk
Well, I'm a sniper, not air cav, so I pretty much wait until they hop out anyway.

As for people insta-bailing out of tanks and running into towers; as Incompetent said: tough shit. People get away all the time, it's part of the game. Do snipers cry that infantry can reach cover before they finish reloading to make that second shot? No, it's part of the game. We live with it and make what kills we can.
Well sniping is not the same, some snipers take shots at anything they see...others wait for the clean shot the other snipers give them.

I love sniping next to a newbie sniper, they hit my target and I take the kill
__________________
Post at me bro.

Baneblade is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-03, 11:23 PM   [Ignore Me] #17
Spee
Colonel
 
Spee's Avatar
 


Easy fix:


Add an animation showing the pilots opening the hatch, and physically bailing from the vehicle, even if its in flight.

Stops tower drops, buffs AA, and makes perfect sense.
__________________
Spee is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-03, 11:28 PM   [Ignore Me] #18
martyr
Contributor
Brigadier General
 
martyr's Avatar
 
Misc Info


i love it. i don't mind dying in my aircraft, maybe because i suck as infantry. that's how i got my name, too - many years ago, of course.
__________________
-martyr
martyr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-03, 11:48 PM   [Ignore Me] #19
BlackHawk
Staff Sergeant
 
BlackHawk's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by Warborn
Someone getting into cover is absolutely nothing like someone bailing from an aircraft. Getting to cover and not getting to cover, especially when avoiding sniper fire, takes a certain amount of skill (or, at least, caution and experience). Bailing from an aircraft simply requires an alt and a G key, with the only risk being when you're getting hit by massive amounts of AA and your craft goes up in seconds.
Actually, if we're going to be specific, all getting into cover requires is the use of the W key, so it requires LESS skill than bailing . Btw, that was an analogy.

So far I've still not read anything valid about why pilots should get a "get out of jail free" card with the old style bailing compared to what ground vehicle drivers go through. The only reason for it I'm seeing basically consists of "that's how it was before and I liked it so fairness and logic be damned, change it back".
And I don't see why anyone should get a "Guaranteed Kill!!!" card. I'm not saying change it back to the way it was before, just offering a different type of reward system that also allows the pilot to eject if he reacts quickly enough.


You know Sobekus, I'm kind of surprised that you're arguing against my idea, considering it's derived from your own...
I love sniping next to a newbie sniper, they hit my target and I take the kill
That's just mean to your fellow snipers I prefer to get both shots myself
__________________
Destiny, chance, fate, fortune - they're all just ways of claiming your successes without claiming your failures.
BlackHawk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-04, 12:02 AM   [Ignore Me] #20
Warborn
Contributor
Major General
 
Warborn's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by BlackHawk
Btw, that was an analogy.
It's funny that someone who uses "btw" is trying to educate me on the English language. By the way, here's one for you.

And I don't see why anyone should get a "Guaranteed Kill!!!" card.
Yeah, and what's up with infantry combat? I mean, shooting infantry with guns enough times is basically a guarenteed kill card. The infantry guys should be able to click a button really quickly and teleport back to their AMS/tower/base before they die. Pilots should get the same feature. Nobody should have to die from being shot a lot if they can click a button fast enough.

You take X damage, you die. That's how things work. Pilots were the only people exempt from this rule and, inshallah, they will never be so again.

Last edited by Warborn; 2004-12-04 at 12:04 AM.
Warborn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-04, 12:24 AM   [Ignore Me] #21
GeneralRazor
Master Sergeant
 
GeneralRazor's Avatar
 


After much thought, I think that the bailing mech would be a good thing if it started at 75% damage (I voted no). To me, that would be the time the mechanism would most likely be liable to fail. It also would take some amount of skill for the AA user. Non-real world of course, because that would be more like at 98-99% (because your seat would have to be burnt up).

That aside, since this change should have been made before all the AA weaponry came out, I think we should have true AV maxes that are a real threat to vehicles and lock on, or in the TR's case do non lock-on "suprise" damage like the pounder does to air. Also a "groundguard" that is exactly like the skyguard that does equal damage to ground vehicles.

ABFR is next....
GeneralRazor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-04, 10:36 AM   [Ignore Me] #22
DeepStrikeck
Sergeant Major
 
DeepStrikeck's Avatar
 


What about having this new bail feature work randomly? Right now, it will never let you bail below 25% life left. How about there is a thing that randomly decides if you can bail or not? At 100% life, you have 100% chance of bailing, and that percentage greatly decreases as your aircraft's life decreases. It wouldn't be a 1:1 ratio, that would be pretty stupid. But how about at 25%, you have let's say, a 5% chance of bailing. There is still hope for the pilot, thus not a guaranteed kill as some have mentioned, but you will get the kill 95% of the time. (These aren't necessarily the numbers that would be used or the best. However, I believe the number should be under 10% if you are at or below 25% health. This number would decrease to a 0% bail chance below 10% of the aircraft's health.) Thus, everybody wins because pilots still have hope and Anti-Aircraft guys or other pilots have a very good chance of killing the pilots. And by the way, I am a Starfire MAX, Sparrow MAX, Burster MAX, Peregrine with Anti-Aircraft weaponry and an Air Calvary pilot, so this is just my combined views and wishes of when I am in the field.
DeepStrikeck is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-04, 11:37 AM   [Ignore Me] #23
Corsairsn
Corporal
 


Agree with ^^
__________________
Corsairsn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-04, 12:23 PM   [Ignore Me] #24
BlackHawk
Staff Sergeant
 
BlackHawk's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by Warborn
It's funny that someone who uses "btw" is trying to educate me on the English language. By the way, here's one for you.
GASP! Oh no! What have I done?!?! I have abbreviated a phrase in common usage on a public message board on the internet, where such a thing is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN! Oh, woe is me! All arguments I have ever made and ever will make are now invalid, because of three simple letters! I must apologize to you, oh Great Warborn, Master of Grammer, for offended thine senses so! Oh great members of Clan Draconis Lupus, please forgive the poor misguided soul who has befouled your most holy of holy places with an abbreviation! I beg you!

Yeah, and what's up with infantry combat? I mean, shooting infantry with guns enough times is basically a guarenteed kill card. The infantry guys should be able to click a button really quickly and teleport back to their AMS/tower/base before they die. Pilots should get the same feature. Nobody should have to die from being shot a lot if they can click a button fast enough.
Yeah, and Personal Shield should be removed, since I have to shoot people more times to kill them. Oh, and Surge. That lets people run away if they react quickly enough. Can you imagine that? Medkits are completely unfair. And then there are these "support" certs, where people can actually HEAL themselves . They've got all these ways for grunts to survive a little longer in battle, and it's not fair to the people trying to kill them. We really shouldn't have to shoot them that many times! I mean, if I shot them nine times, why should I have to shoot them that tenth time to make sure they die? How about when an infantry has lost all of his armor and takes one point of health damage, he becomes incapacitated and slowly bleeds to death! Yeah!


Anyway, all I've got to say about the "bail malfunction" is: What do you think pilots are going to do? Go down with their ship, or learn to bail earlier?

Originally Posted by DeepStrikeck
What about having this new bail feature work randomly? Right now, it will never let you bail below 25% life left. How about there is a thing that randomly decides if you can bail or not? At 100% life, you have 100% chance of bailing, and that percentage greatly decreases as your aircraft's life decreases. It wouldn't be a 1:1 ratio, that would be pretty stupid. But how about at 25%, you have let's say, a 5% chance of bailing. There is still hope for the pilot, thus not a guaranteed kill as some have mentioned, but you will get the kill 95% of the time. (These aren't necessarily the numbers that would be used or the best. However, I believe the number should be under 10% if you are at or below 25% health. This number would decrease to a 0% bail chance below 10% of the aircraft's health.) Thus, everybody wins because pilots still have hope and Anti-Aircraft guys or other pilots have a very good chance of killing the pilots. And by the way, I am a Starfire MAX, Sparrow MAX, Burster MAX, Peregrine with Anti-Aircraft weaponry and an Air Calvary pilot, so this is just my combined views and wishes of when I am in the field.
That sounds good too. I didn't come in here and say "OMFG! Teh bail malfuncti0n is teh suxzorz!". I didn't say we should change it back to the way it was. Was just offering an alternative idea that I thought might be better.
__________________
Destiny, chance, fate, fortune - they're all just ways of claiming your successes without claiming your failures.
BlackHawk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-04, 01:54 PM   [Ignore Me] #25
Teichgraeber
Private
 
Teichgraeber's Avatar
 
Sorry


I just Hate it!
Teichgraeber is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-04, 03:30 PM   [Ignore Me] #26
Warborn
Contributor
Major General
 
Warborn's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by BlackHawk
Grammer
Grammar.

You're really not that good at this english thing, are you? Maybe you should lay off the witty "hay this is an ANALOGY LOL OWNED" comments in the future.
Warborn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-04, 06:27 PM   [Ignore Me] #27
BlackHawk
Staff Sergeant
 
BlackHawk's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by Warborn
Grammar.

You're really not that good at this english thing, are you? Maybe you should lay off the witty "hay this is an ANALOGY LOL OWNED" comments in the future.
I knew you wouldn't be able to resist that!
__________________
Destiny, chance, fate, fortune - they're all just ways of claiming your successes without claiming your failures.
BlackHawk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-05, 12:33 AM   [Ignore Me] #28
Warborn
Contributor
Major General
 
Warborn's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by BlackHawk
I knew you wouldn't be able to resist that!
Warborn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-07, 04:49 AM   [Ignore Me] #29
Lonehunter
Lieutenant General
 
Lonehunter's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by Warborn
It's funny that someone who uses "btw" is trying to educate me on the English language. By the way, here's one for you.



The infantry guys should be able to click a button really quickly and teleport back to their AMS/tower/base before they die. Pilots should get the same feature.
When you bail from an aircraft and hit the ground you are not safe. You have a few seconds of WTF time where your vision is a little screwy, then, you're out in the field against an aircraft. The odds of the pilot winning in this situation are pretty high UNLESS, the bailer is a cloaker with Sensor Shield and the pilot doens't have darklight. In wich case the pilot's low BR is to blame.

You take X damage, you die. That's how things work. Pilots were the only people exempt from this rule and, inshallah, they will never be so again.
I just really hate that this is in the game now, my blood boils just thinking about it. They should just remove the "Out of control" part completely, so that when you take X amount of damage, you just die, that's it. Then the pilot would skip the part of the game where they are completely helpless and can not do anything. That one thing can make people very angry, not being able to control their own actions. Exactly why Fear was removed out of PvP dueling in EQ, Sony had the brains then, but it's all in the past. This game is gonna me more worthless then shit in a few years anyway, don't know why I'm arguing.
__________________
Originally Posted by Higby View Post
And if you back in 2003 decided you wanted to play RTS games, between then and now you'd have dozens of RTS games you could have played. If you decided to play MMOFPS' between then and now, there were none
Lonehunter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2004-12-07, 05:08 AM   [Ignore Me] #30
Warborn
Contributor
Major General
 
Warborn's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by Lonehunter187
When you bail from an aircraft and hit the ground you are not safe. You have a few seconds of WTF time where your vision is a little screwy, then, you're out in the field against an aircraft. The odds of the pilot winning in this situation are pretty high UNLESS, the bailer is a cloaker with Sensor Shield and the pilot doens't have darklight. In wich case the pilot's low BR is to blame.
That's more of a chance than the guy who gets hit with two bolt driver rounds in rapid succession has.

I just really hate that this is in the game now, my blood boils just thinking about it. They should just remove the "Out of control" part completely, so that when you take X amount of damage, you just die, that's it. Then the pilot would skip the part of the game where they are completely helpless and can not do anything. That one thing can make people very angry, not being able to control their own actions. Exactly why Fear was removed out of PvP dueling in EQ, Sony had the brains then, but it's all in the past. This game is gonna me more worthless then shit in a few years anyway, don't know why I'm arguing.
I agree, the loss of control part has no point for aircraft anymore. The only argument for it now that bailing won't really work at that point is "realism", but honestly, I'd rather they instead make the "realism" work when the aircraft is "destroyed". I think it would be cool if aircraft that are reduced to 0 armor (what would blow them up now) instead fall to the ground and blow up, with of course no chance to bail. Maybe if they take a lot of extra damage while in the air they explode mid-air, but it would be cool to see aircraft which otherwise explode mid-air to instead go crashing to the ground. Hell, maybe you'll even get an ironic kill and land on something the enemy owns.
Warborn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 1 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 PM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.