Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: RPG + Hamma + Shotgun = Dead RPG
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2012-06-29, 09:56 AM | [Ignore Me] #17 | ||
First Sergeant
|
I honestly don't get it with stew. It's like the clarity of his sentences is inversely proportional to the amount of words. But yeah, the game is Free to play. Deal with it.
|
||
|
2012-06-29, 10:10 AM | [Ignore Me] #20 | ||
Major
|
He is on about people making threads about how they can get money. Nutty ideas like charging to make outfits and stuff like that. The worry is the devs will see these ideas/use them and down the line this will affect the free playerbase. I agree with him really, as im going to be one of these free players. I`ll be the first to admit it. The game sounds like its being changed alot and dumbed down even tho the battles are considerably larger. The amount of coin i spent on active planetside subs over the years and what development did we get? All the planetside subs only went into everquest development. So i don`t mind playing this for free at all.
|
||
|
2012-06-29, 10:18 AM | [Ignore Me] #21 | |||
Cheers, GG Sent from Auraxis using Tapatalk |
||||
|
2012-06-29, 10:20 AM | [Ignore Me] #22 | ||
Sergeant
|
SoE will make millions with booster packs, camouflages and weapons.
I have no doubts. I just hope SoE is sticking to their saying that they will not introduce pay2win. Nothing they implement should affect the ammount of bullets it takes to kill someone or the ammount of bullets able to take before you die. Anything else isn't gamebreaking, but if premium users survive longer and/or kill faster, then the game is already destined to fail it's goal of MMO. |
||
|
2012-06-29, 10:35 AM | [Ignore Me] #23 | |||
Major
|
Auraxium is not made to buy outfit slots and stuff like this (( i know thats your crew idea )) but even thats make no sense at all ! The auraxium cost will be at least 10 time higher than the station cash cost anyway to buy weapons and atachements etc... Thats mean a lots of hours of gameplay ... people will not be able to buy any new gears if they have to trade their play time (( auraxium reward )) to have acess to the core options of the game such as outfit creation and others feature like this, its just stupid and anyway will not provide any revenue it will just be a unecessary stupid limitation ! |
|||
|
2012-06-29, 10:50 AM | [Ignore Me] #24 | ||
First Sergeant
|
Also, I distinctively recall someone saying very true about this whole unlock Situation.
"If you need unlocks to enjoy a game, you'll be first against the wall when the revolution comes." |
||
|
2012-06-29, 10:56 AM | [Ignore Me] #25 | |||
Master Sergeant
|
In other words...don't worry about it! It'll all work itself out and no one gets hurt. And besides, outfits are already going to be starting with a high population limit. Paying real cash to go from 500 to 600 slots doesn't sound like a casual player's worry anyway. |
|||
|
2012-06-29, 10:57 AM | [Ignore Me] #26 | |||
Major
|
people will enjoy to unlock their new scopes , new weapons atachements etc.. thats what auraxium is made for the time you spend in game as a (( in game contents players )) Is rewarded with auraxium and others ressources its almost like a pay for your in game time and effort and thats great for fre players because they make the experience more enjoyable for those who actually pay real money in it ! |
|||
|
2012-06-29, 11:28 AM | [Ignore Me] #29 | ||
Private
|
None of the stuff Stew listed in the bottom of his post has anything to do with p2w, but does restrict some gameplay features. Some of that stuff he listed should DEFINITELY be up for discussion for premium only though. Would be a bit stupid for every freebie that hops in game to be able to create a outfit with a dumb name, kinda believe outfit creation should be limited to people who at least do one micro-transaction or w/e (so only people who care/support the game are outfit leaders). Restricting freebies isn't the way to go, but having premium only benefits that don't effect power ingame only increases revenue for the game. Which is good.
|
||
|
2012-06-29, 11:38 AM | [Ignore Me] #30 | ||
Second Lieutenant
|
I don't think they'll ever have a payment requirement for creating outfits... cutting players off from such a big part of the game might not be P2W, but is certainly can hurt the game a lot. To be completely honest, it's up to the devs to come up with new and interesting skins, camo patterns and whatnot to keep the $$ rolling in. Players shouldn't feel like the game is cutting them out if they don't pay. And paying for things that you ALSO can obtain by just playing is not doing that, just fyi.
That said, before anyone whines... I will be bying stuff... probably things I don't even need just because I want to support them.
__________________
|
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|