AGN: Do you prefer a 6mo roadmap with a lot of movement or 2 with little movement? RCCQ#69

[kubacheski]

I love that show. Baby steps and death therapy.

Bob Wiley: "Shit-eating son-of-a-bitch... bastard, douche-bag, twat, numb-nuts, dickhead, bitch!"

I sometimes have Tourettes like outbursts at PS2 when I repeatedly get wacked.

[ShadoViper]

How about they just start releasing content and continents with a resource revamp and inter-continental-lattic.

Then I will care about a roadmap.

[typhaon]

This is such a minor, minor, minor thing...

What we all want are finished features.

[Crator]

Meaning the 2 month RoadMap would generally be set in stone and not change? It doesn't really explain what the 2 month RoadMap would give us in the statement that Smed issued. *With the understanding that the sentence which is in quotes in the OP is what Smed said.

I'd say go with the 2 month RoadMap that is more or less set-in-stone and then list things outside that 2 month scope that will be worked on after the 2 month list.

The items not in the 2 month scope won't have any specification of "when" other then it will be done sometime inside 6 months. Anything in the 6 month scope, but not in the 2 month scope, could be changed out with something else. But if something gets put in the 2 month scope it typically will be done inside that time.

[kubacheski]

Originally Posted by Crator

But if something gets put in the 2 month scope it typically will be done inside that time.

I love how you qualified this with the word "typically".

[Crator]

Originally Posted by kubacheski

I love how you qualified this with the word "typically".

Yeah, that's part of the "Shit happens" clause. LOL

But hey, Smed is the one saying the 2 month deal will be done within that time. Is there any reason to not trust him? {Rhetorical question, please don't answer} LOL