Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Corrupting youth since '02
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2003-05-14, 08:41 PM | [Ignore Me] #16 | ||
Contributor PSU Staff
Code Hound |
Hopefully they will find a happy balance between the empires. NC still gets OWNED hardcore.
__________________
powdahound.com |
||
|
2003-05-14, 09:16 PM | [Ignore Me] #21 | ||
Contributor Captain
|
I knew the sanc strike would come, why else would there be gun towers at each sanc warpgate?
Lodestar....omfg. Maybe we could carry tanks? APC's? God imagine a bridge battle and then seeing 4 vanguards fly overhead and drop down behind you. I think i just wet myself. Bomber better not turn into a spam fest. |
||
|
2003-05-15, 03:27 PM | [Ignore Me] #29 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
__________________
"Never pet a burning dog and never fry bacon naked."--Gary Busey |
|||
|
2003-05-15, 03:44 PM | [Ignore Me] #30 | ||
Sergeant
|
the devs read my mind. i was thinking about upcoming vehicles all of last night and this morning. basically i predicted medium air transports (but more of a 3 to 4 man infantry transport), a serious AA vehicle, and some electronic warfare (mobile radar and radar jammers). and voila.
but... i don't see why the need for bombers when reavers already fit that role and some more. the reaver rockets has high RoF, mediocure/decent accuracy, and good direct/splash damage. they already devestate infantries and vehicles alike. how much better can the bombers devestate everything else on the ground? i predict the addition of bombers will call for even more efficient AA on top of the skyguard. something like an empire specific AA tank. quite obviously actually, seeing how most vehicle types follow this trend: harasser->assault buggy, lightning->assault tank, so skyguard will evolve into heavy AA. |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|