Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: You have lost control of this vehicle.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2012-06-08, 09:08 AM | [Ignore Me] #32 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
I think another large consideration is going to be hard drive read speed. The original PS front loaded all assets. This version, with its customization options, looks to use disk streaming.
That through put is going to impact frame rate. Not to mention, on players and such, batching is going to be very hard to manage, unless all customization is post. |
||
|
2012-06-08, 09:09 AM | [Ignore Me] #33 | ||
Private
|
Steam Survey for Primary Display Resolution.
0.18% use 2560 x 1600 Not many use a single 30" PC Monitor. Most common is 25.15% use 1920 x 1080 Link: http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey So it should run pretty good for most. Last edited by xSCORPIONx; 2012-06-08 at 09:12 AM. |
||
|
2012-06-08, 09:09 AM | [Ignore Me] #34 | ||
Contributor First Sergeant
|
Ooooh...
In high resolution and not completly optimized, it's quite a performance to have such great graphics and performances (I think I heard it was at 60fps?). Pretty awesome ! And I have a GTX670, so I'm happy |
||
|
2012-06-08, 09:10 AM | [Ignore Me] #35 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
The Devs have been reminding us that the game is being optimized to run on older systems, and reviewers are already talking about how smooth the gameplay is. Even if you are two, three, or four rungs down the "GTX 670" ladder, I think that the game will look beautiful on whatever your rigs are.
~Zachariah |
||
|
2012-06-08, 09:13 AM | [Ignore Me] #38 | |||
Second Lieutenant
|
i am gonna upgrade my pc soon ( yes for ps2 ofcourse ^^ ) and i was thinking about getting a asus HD7850 2GB direct CUII i'm geussing this should also be enough to run ps2 on the highest settings at a steady 30 fps, once the game is optimized a little more. demo booths usually tend to have overkill hardware anyway. not so worried about my cpu since most games run gpu heavy not cpu heavy Last edited by megamold; 2012-06-08 at 09:16 AM. |
|||
|
2012-06-08, 09:26 AM | [Ignore Me] #41 | ||
Brigadier General
|
Just remember that the game still isn't fully optimized, and they were also running it with the settings turned up and the resolution cranked higher than most peoples tv's/monitors support.
Once they got the optimization finished, a lower end system will presumably be able to run it at somewhat lower resolutions with some of the graphical bells and whistles toned down. Not talking about weather or vegetation, that shit should always be on, but stuff like texture and shadow quality can be lowered somewhat without affecting game balance. |
||
|
2012-06-08, 09:28 AM | [Ignore Me] #43 | ||
Second Lieutenant
|
running the same card as Basti, no over clocking. Never had any probs with any game at 1920x1080... with an i7 2600k, 8gb memory. Only problem for me is... the SSD-drive I used to install and store things broke down, so I'm running all games from a external USB drive atm xD
Also, I do believe your system memory will be more important than gpu if you have problems with performance... so be sure to check that out before you go spend hundreds of dollars on a new card, when all you really only might need is an extra 2gb memory.
__________________
Last edited by Sabot; 2012-06-08 at 09:32 AM. |
||
|
2012-06-08, 09:30 AM | [Ignore Me] #44 | ||
Sergeant
|
I can remember PS1 being quite hard on the disk. Even today it's textures are quite high resolution and on PCs back then few had enough memory to handle them.
But now we have SSDs, so slowness/stuttering due to the disk are a thing of the past. Also now that most graphics cards come with a lot of ram, they are able to handle all the work that used to be dumped on system memory/disk. Last edited by Nasher; 2012-06-08 at 09:33 AM. |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|