Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: The only place where ANTs can crush a human.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
2013-01-14, 11:48 AM | [Ignore Me] #8 | ||
Staff Sergeant
|
Lancer was definitely iconic in PS1. I envied it a lot as NC. Never did like the Phoenix in comparison (although it had its merits I'm sure).
I hope it is ES and that the other launchers appear for their respective factions too. The game needs a bit more ES variety IMO. |
||
|
2013-01-14, 01:15 PM | [Ignore Me] #11 | ||
Master Sergeant
|
I think they could still balance it by just giving you only about 3-5 seconds of controlling it that way you had the time to line it up but wouldn't have enough time to fly the missile all the way past the target and flip it from behind that way you would still need to flank with it to hit the vehicle in the back. Unless they were really close but then the tank is dumb for getting that close in the first place.
|
||
|
2013-01-14, 01:43 PM | [Ignore Me] #12 | |||
Captain
|
|
|||
|
2013-01-14, 12:45 PM | [Ignore Me] #13 | ||
Corporal
|
The Lancer is basically a man-portable Saron HRB; as others have said it charges for a second then lets out a very fast straight projectile with no fall-off.
I too am optimistic about getting the Phoenix back for NC. I miss that launcher.
__________________
Papagiorgio, CR5 NC Markov Last edited by Papagiorgio; 2013-01-14 at 12:53 PM. |
||
|
2013-01-14, 02:18 PM | [Ignore Me] #15 | ||
Major
|
The benefits of the ES weapons will be massive. If implemented as near-mirrors of PS1 weaponry, the Phoenix would be an excellent weapon to deal with door-camping tanks as it could strike the vulnerable top or rear armor of a tank from within a building. The Lancer would be deadly to Liberators and MAX units, with the Striker being the do-everything, anytime weapon.
I hope they all come back. I know the Phoenix had its "problems" in PS1, namely that it was almost totally unfun to be shot at with. It still served a serious role in stamping out MAX units and vehicles who incorrectly thought they were in cover. The point of the Striker in PS2 could be a rapid lock-on time, a sizeable clip, and the ability to lock on to all armored units as well as dumb-fire. Last edited by AThreatToYou; 2013-01-14 at 02:22 PM. |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|