Where are the machine guns?

[Ed the MAD]

Originally Posted by FraudulentBob

The M204 is a LMG, and the M203 is an M16 w/a 40mm grenade launcher mounted on the bottom, get yer shit straight.

no, the M203 is the grenade launcher itself. it can either be attached to the barrel of any STANAG rifle(M16, AUG, G36, ect.), or used as a stand-alone weapon with a pistol grip and a folding stock.


a stickler for artilley, that's me.



[edit] OH WAIT! the M204 is the same thing as the M203, i belive. yes, US's primary SAW is the FN 249 Minimi. also, know as the M249.


I stand a corrected Man![/edit]

[Flammey]

I'll stick with the gun turrets. Hopefully they will increase the max angle on them. They can decrease the max distance to compensate.

[FraudulentBob]

I want some mounted Machine Guns in the freaking bunkers, they're worthless now, you should add something like MG 42s from WWII that troops can take control of and mow down invading infantry, that would be sweet.

[Lonehunter]

Originally Posted by Ghoest9

No one over br 5 is afraid of supression fire.

Its simply not effective.

All an MG nest would be is a target for snipers.

Good point