T-Ray Q&A with ISK (Addressing vet concerns) - Page 3 - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: Where Rank doesn't matter!
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2012-11-02, 10:42 AM   [Ignore Me] #31
Crator
Major General
 
Crator's Avatar
 
Re: T-Ray Q&A with ISK (Addressing vet concerns)


Open beta for a F2P game in my mind is: Cash Shop with possibility of character wipes. If character wipes occur then Station Cash used to purchase things in the shop would be refunded. Would have been nice to have that happen but I guess they don't need it? Or they just ran out of time to do something like that.
__________________
>>CRATOR<<
Don't feed the trolls, unless it's funny to do so...
Crator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-02, 04:25 PM   [Ignore Me] #32
GuyFawkes
First Sergeant
 
GuyFawkes's Avatar
 
Re: T-Ray Q&A with ISK (Addressing vet concerns)


Originally Posted by RodenyC View Post
Lol no they don't.What have they listen to and changed?The metagame?Suppose to be in the game regardless.Have they fixed bases yet?Have they actually addressed the real issue of driver actually being a driver?Same with Sancs.All the reasons they've said are because of their own personal opinion.That's why I can't take them serious anymore.
If you turn your own phrasing around to the same from the developers perspective you may be able to appreciate their point of view.

for example

We're changing the metagame, we're improving bases, just look at Amerish. We're addressing the driver/gunner concerns by adding in certifications so people who want to can have that as an option. We feel sanctuaries drag people away from the fight but once we have more continents that the 3 at launch we can start to implement the idea of home continents in due time. All the things we are doing is to evolve the game and make it an enjoyable experience for everyone wanting to play, but players of the original have their own opinion and dont want to evolve. The Game is evolving despite them. Thats why we struggle to take them seriously any more
GuyFawkes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-02, 05:11 PM   [Ignore Me] #33
RodenyC
Master Sergeant
 
RodenyC's Avatar
 
Re: T-Ray Q&A with ISK (Addressing vet concerns)


^Can you provide the source of that quote?
__________________
Smed doesn't care about players.If it's fun to him it doesn't matter to players.
YT: http://www.youtube.com/user/rainbowwarriorguy
RodenyC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-02, 11:20 PM   [Ignore Me] #34
GuyFawkes
First Sergeant
 
GuyFawkes's Avatar
 
Re: T-Ray Q&A with ISK (Addressing vet concerns)


Originally Posted by RodenyC View Post
^Can you provide the source of that quote?
Thats easy, the source was yourself

You gave an unfounded opinion, which I quoted. The 2nd highlighted box is your own opinion replaced with details openly available in a format so you get an insight as to the flip side of what you were saying.

Psu is becoming the last bastion of freedom for the guy carrying a cardboard with 'the end of the world is nigh' written on it, but no one is listening
GuyFawkes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-03, 12:30 AM   [Ignore Me] #35
cellinaire
Captain
 
Re: T-Ray Q&A with ISK (Addressing vet concerns)


Originally Posted by PredatorFour View Post
Errr ... No. It`s not a real beta at all. They said they were going to have a `propper beta` but are now releasing the game far too early. A real beta wouldve been about a year for a game of this magnitude, taking the original into account too. Wouldve given the devs ample time to work their magic and not rush a gem of a game.
It was a real beta while it lasted. How can a rushed date make all the efforts in Beta phase totally meaningless?

And yeah many things they changed / added recently should have been there in the first place...so what? How can that kind of logic make all the changes we've been watching so far entirely meaningless? If they really not listened this time, then the state of this game should be far more worse right now. Far more worse.

I'm f***ing not trying to be a SOE fanboi, but cold truth or not, some of these comments in this thread are ridiculous.
cellinaire is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-03, 07:18 AM   [Ignore Me] #36
PredatorFour
Major
 
PredatorFour's Avatar
 
Re: T-Ray Q&A with ISK (Addressing vet concerns)


Originally Posted by cellinaire View Post
It was a real beta while it lasted. How can a rushed date make all the efforts in Beta phase totally meaningless?
Never said it was meaningless at all, you completely misunderstood me whilst falling off the high horse.

Originally Posted by cellinaire View Post
some of these comments in this thread are ridiculous.
Too true.
PredatorFour is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 PM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.