Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Staying on the scene, like a sex machine, since 2003
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2013-02-04, 10:48 AM | [Ignore Me] #31 | ||
Lieutenant General
|
Why is it the analysis of The Crown usualy ignores the fact you're always fighting two zergs, no matter who's side you're on?
A. 1/3 tries to hold it. B. 1/3 tries to take it. C. 1/3 tries to take it. A + B face off with C. A + C face off with B. B + C face off with A. Nobody can win the ~66.67% enemy threat, thus A stays where it is and can't break out, while none of the attackers can dislodge A as they're to busy preventing that to happen in favour of the other attacking party from any good footholds that might lead to that. |
||
|
2013-02-04, 02:37 PM | [Ignore Me] #32 | ||
Contributor Second Lieutenant
|
They should simply introduce the dedicated diver concept for mbts. That would cause at least half so many mbts.
But his grace John "Stubborn" Smedley still thinks it is so much fun to drive and use the main gun at the same time. I think he never heard of the one man show tank called the lighting. |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|