Originally Posted by Lonehunter
Most people don't. When you use a term like endgame that has roots so deep in MMORPGs and has so many different meanings in THOSE games, you're assuming everyone playing this totally different game will have the same meaning for that word.
So it's all ready lost in translation...
Then you get all the FPS people who haven't touched an MMO in their life thinking "WTF is this guy talking about? The end of a match?"
So when someone wants to express their opinion they should take the time to write out legitimate thought, concern, and feedback instead of just going with a copout and picking some label they expect to talk for them.
|
When someone explains what they mean and use the word "endgame" (like my post for instance) in the context it was given at the start of the thread, and you are trying to argue about the "correct" term beyond further clarification of what the person intended, you are wasting my time and everyone else's.
Endgame; if you want to argue semantics, would actually work in the context of say.. capturing a continent and locking someone else out. That would technically "end" the "game" of said place, thus offering a resolve, albeit, temporary.
Either way, it doesn't really matter. I'm not here to talk about another damn meta game argument.