Wtf is with these two VS vehs? - Page 3

Camping Carl · 2003-01-09, 02:34 AM

Yup, he killed it. I liked that sig too.

CDaws · 2003-01-09, 02:38 AM

He wouldn't explain what was wrong, so how do I know what he's talking about it being too big. Oh well. Guess I will never know since he didn't explain. And now since he did take it off the other posts have no meaning.

Sputty · 2003-01-09, 02:40 AM

Nice to know the staff does work at least
But your signature was too large horizontally and was making the forum tables(boxes, size, etc.) stretch

afex · 2003-01-09, 02:41 AM

how much simpler could i have put it?

your sig was too big.

if you couldn't tell how/why you need to get your eyes/brain checked.

CDaws · 2003-01-09, 02:44 AM

Too big how? That's my question. Afex no need to resort to name calling and insulting me. I thought it would at least be above a staff member not do do things like that but, I guess in your case I'm wrong.

afex · 2003-01-09, 02:48 AM

i'm not calling you any names or trying to insult you.

i'm am completely honestly BAFFLED how you can not understand how your sig was too big. i dont sugar coat things.

here it is like it was.
First to bleed, Last to leave, Rangers lead the way!

no go compare that to the other pages in this thread. cant you tell the difference?

CDaws · 2003-01-09, 02:50 AM

If your talking about the res size of a screen I'm running at 1024 x 768 so I see nothing wrong on my end.

afex · 2003-01-09, 02:53 AM

sigh.

i am also running at 1024x768.

there IS a difference. it is OBVIOUS.

i can't explain it any simpler than i already have.

CDaws · 2003-01-09, 02:56 AM

Then please explain because I don't see a difference I really don't. Or if you can't, get an explaniation for me please.

afex · 2003-01-09, 02:56 AM

Originally posted by afex
i can't explain it any simpler than i already have.

Vimp · 2003-01-09, 03:04 AM

I thought I knew what afex was saying but since I don't see any difference either I guess I have to side with Special on this one.

At the least you coulda edited it in such a way that it fixed the problem with out deleting it.

afex · 2003-01-09, 03:05 AM

am i going absolutely crazy?

how is it possible for anyone not to see how all his sig images were stretching the layout of the site???

i feel like i'm in the fucking twilight zone here.

Vimp · 2003-01-09, 03:10 AM

The width of this thread is the same as it was before ya removed the sig. I expected it to change but it didn't. But I didn't see a prob in the first place inless your watching at 640x480 cause as it is I can see the whole thing on my screen easy as pie with an inch to spare on each side and my res is 1152x864. Same way before the deletion of the sig.

afex · 2003-01-09, 03:13 AM

the table should never be any wider than the header image at the top.

with his sig, it stretches the page about an inch (1024x768) to each side.

i know i'm not the only one who sees it as suck. carl knew exactly what i was talking about from the getgo.

BLuE_ZeRO · 2003-01-09, 03:19 AM

afex just give up lol if he hasn't figured it out by now he will never figure it out.