King Arthur - Page 3

Indecisive · 2004-07-08, 06:48 PM

"To mideeeeeeeeeeeeeeviiiiil Tiiiiiiiiimes!"

THOU ART TOAST!

Neon Apocalypse · 2004-07-09, 08:26 AM

I think it looks really ghey.

The only reason I would go is to see keira knightley because shes so fucking hot.

Lonehunter · 2004-07-09, 08:34 AM

Originally Posted by Pilgrim

2) Why Are Guin and Arthur Having sex? Outside of the anatomical compatability is there any good reason for this? It's like two people meeting at a night club and deciding to fuck... very romantic!

If they show a clip of that in a preview it will attract people like Neon to the theaters to see it, hence more money.

I liked the movie.

Rayder · 2004-07-09, 08:35 AM

They aren't married in the movie?

Lonehunter · 2004-07-09, 08:36 AM

Maybe...

Come on people try not to spoil anything.

firecrackerNC · 2004-07-09, 09:20 AM

movie looks kickass to me.And Keira is really freakin hot.

Rayder · 2004-07-09, 10:25 AM

If they aren't married in the movie and there's no point going to see it, because it's bs anyway.

firecrackerNC · 2004-07-09, 10:26 AM

So if they arent married its BS? How do you know?How did you know in the real story they got married? Mabey they never did you dont know.

Lonehunter · 2004-07-09, 10:36 AM

Originally Posted by firecrackerNC

you dont know.

That's true for all of us, about what supposedly really happened. As for this IT'S A DAMN MOVIE.

Striker511 · 2004-07-09, 10:44 AM

Il let you know next week about KA
Action sceens looked good, and Im all for swords - hell, id love to see swords in Planetside - think like the Japanese officers in WW2.. vibroblades and claymores..that would rock!

JetRaiden · 2004-07-09, 01:45 PM

Im seeing it today. Napolean Dynamite isnt playing near me yet.

Incompetent · 2004-07-09, 07:53 PM

King Arthur now holds the dubious distinction of the first movie i've ever walked out of.

It was absolute shit.

Pilgrim, For FUCKS SAKE!!! The worst you could come up with was the fucking stirrups?!?! Stirrups can be excused, they probably couldn't keep those pathetic excuses for actors on the horses without them, and truthfully, I barely noticed them while they were busy butchering medival tactics and basic common sense.

Ducimus · 2004-07-09, 08:17 PM

Anyone here besides me like.... oh i dunno, read history?

I havent seen the movie yet, but i gotta say, If you think the movie is BS because its not knights in shining armor in a Medival period;, but instead insinuates that the man behind the myth was a roman..... read up on it. I thoguht it was pure hollywood hype, so i I read up on it, and found out otherwise. I posted a link earlier, go read it if you think its BS

>>busy butchering medival tactics

But its not the medival period, how can the butcher those tactics? Now if they butcher tactics of the period they depict.. thats another matter. Then i'll be tearing the movie up too

Ivan · 2004-07-09, 08:24 PM

I do believe that if Arthur was a real man he would of been roman. I didn't read that link you posted but I've read other site/books and watched other shows that centered around that idea.

I haven't seen the movie, but just cause they use that idea doesn't mean the movie doesn't suck.

It does look stupid to me. I'd wait till it comes to my local cheap theater. It's only 2.50 to see a movie there. Or I'd wait to rent it.

Incompetent · 2004-07-09, 08:27 PM

bastard, you know what I meant

and i have read up on it to a decent extent, enough to know they completely fucked up nearly every aspect of the saxon invasion except the costumes.