Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Are you still reading these?
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2012-02-24, 11:10 PM | [Ignore Me] #52 | |||
Banned
|
I hope he's just drunk and/or high and is trolling hard. |
|||
|
2012-02-24, 11:20 PM | [Ignore Me] #53 | |||
First Lieutenant
|
God I sure hope he's just trolling. I mean they even mentioned in tonight's webcast that the Lancer would work like it did in PS1. But then TRay tweets that? I'm so confused. |
|||
|
2012-02-25, 01:30 AM | [Ignore Me] #55 | ||
Staff Sergeant
|
There's a lot of fuss about the Lancer and whether or not it will be in. While TRay's twitter post is pretty damning, they do talk about that Lancer in the webcast.
http://www.twitch.tv/sonyonlinetv/b/309653892 skip to ~36:35 "We're bringing back all the Planetside 1 mechanics but we took the lock on mechanic is nowgiven to everybody. So everybody can have, hold it, point at an aircraft and just lock on over time. And then we're bringing back the Lancer still works like it did it Planetside 1..." This is coming from Joshua Sanchez, the Combat Lead in PS2. While I don't like saying this maybe TRay is a little mixed up on what is and is not going to be in the game come launch. I can't imagine the Combat Lead talking about the old AV if it won't be ingame while the Senior Art Director may get that mixed up. Take all of this with a grain of salt and DL the video for yourself before it gets taken down. Who knows when they'll rehost it on YouTube. |
||
|
2012-02-25, 03:18 AM | [Ignore Me] #56 | |||
Colonel
|
Looks really good, once again.
__________________
|
|||
|
2012-02-25, 04:31 AM | [Ignore Me] #58 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
I'd much rather have the Lancer than a lock on weapon. It was nice to have such different AV weapons on each faction so I'm not sure why the NC still get their steerable rockets while the VS lose their Lancer, which everyone loved.
|
||
|
2012-02-25, 06:07 AM | [Ignore Me] #59 | |||
Contributor General
|
|
|||
|
2012-02-25, 09:49 AM | [Ignore Me] #60 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
The angle of the photo from the webcast is much better; the weapon is actually longer and more slender than it appeared in the other picture. I think it's a great design; it sounds like it will basically function as an infantry-portable Starfire cannon. I would like them to explain how the energy blasts are laser guided (are they actually warheads wreathed in an energy field? that would be cool).
~Zachariah |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|