Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: It's not polite to stare
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2004-04-19, 12:40 PM | [Ignore Me] #46 | ||
Corporal
|
Ive seen different pics of it with a rocket launcher on the left and right side but not together. This is why I thought it might have two. Either way it will act as if it only had one as it will fire from one then the other like all the other dual weapons systems. It prolly will be somewhat effective against prowlers and vanguards from long range but they will prolly subcome to the sniping of a magrider. I believe it only takes two hits from the heavy rail beam to destroy a lisk as it is now.
__________________
"Everyone wants to go to heaven but no one wants to die" |
||
|
2004-04-19, 04:47 PM | [Ignore Me] #48 | ||
I must say give the lightinings the same weapons, So a guass cannon instead of the 75mm on the Nc and a Fluxpod on the VS instead of the 75 and give the TR quad independantly firinging 15mm's (all shoot at teh same time or the fire one after another with 4* the fire rate)
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. Last edited by Rbstr; 2004-04-19 at 05:41 PM. |
|||
|
2004-04-19, 06:57 PM | [Ignore Me] #54 | ||
Major
|
All I have to say to this is - I hope they fix out the dual system. Two Hellfire cannons on the Fury. They should fire at the same time. What's the point of two cannons if they're gonna take turns? The 20mm Reaver cannons, Basilisk guns, Prowler guns, a lot of them - take turns. It's just annoying.
__________________
Doop |
||
|
2004-04-19, 07:05 PM | [Ignore Me] #56 | ||
they should take turns but fire twice as fast:
it goes bam...bam...bam...bam normaly, the dual should go bambambambambambambam but if it did go the other way it should fire at the exact same fire rate, as they are speperate weapons and they are not dependant on one another
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. Last edited by Rbstr; 2004-04-19 at 07:07 PM. |
|||
|
2004-04-21, 06:45 AM | [Ignore Me] #57 | ||
Sergeant
|
all of you tell the VS to stop bitching: have you ever been on a thresher and fired a flux cannon? IT SUCKS! VS folks are just worried they are getting tossed a bone becuse the devs couldn't use their imagination and think of anything better. so they said, "well, NC and TR got one, we have to do something...screw it, throw some flux cannnons on that similar to the threshar."
man, i almost NEVER see someone rolling around in a thresher. want to know why? cuz it SUCKS BAD. screw AA. the TR and NC new deliverers will actually be useful. the image VS get is just another crappy vehicle that might look cool, but no one will use. VS have every right to be concerned. we don't know for sure it wil suck, but, when sony brings up the flux cannon, can you blame us for getting worried? i do 100% agree that we don't know for sure it will suck. but, i repeat, VS has every right to be worried about it. |
||
|
2004-04-21, 12:44 PM | [Ignore Me] #59 | ||
Corporal
|
Thinking the TR battlewagon will be a good substatue for the skyguard along with the ability to harm armored targets and infantry but with better armor then the skyguard. If these 15mm do full damage to armor then they will prolly have the best TTK out of them all but thats saposily what TR are sapose to do. Would be nice for the TR to get a vehicle thats better then the other factions counterparts though for once. It does require 5 crew but then again all of the gunners get a main gun, if our tank was like that we would have no complants.
__________________
"Everyone wants to go to heaven but no one wants to die" |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|