Post your Doom 3 Checklist! - Page 4

Kaltagesta · 2004-07-21, 11:54 AM

Why dont you like games that are pretty for pretties sake? You know that gameplay and graphics are mutually exclusive, right? Is FF9 worse than FF10, just because it's graphics are better? Just because a game doesnt need to have good graphics doesnt mean that it's worse because it has.

Dharkbayne · 2004-07-21, 11:55 AM

Originally Posted by Spee

Incorrect. I said that I dont mind games who have a reason for a good graphics engine, not to just be pretty for pretty's sake. LOTR had a lot of stuff incapable/far too expensive to be made as a prop.

And Dhark, making a game that looks like shit and a game that almost mandates a 200+ dollar upgrade to your computer to enjoy a "Feature" the game was tagged with are two entirely separate things.

This is the Console player in me talking. The graphics are a gimmick. Would you all probably be just as excited as you all are for this game if it had, oh, I dunno, the MP2 Engine running it? Probably, but it wouldnt change the gameplay, or the way you played the game. Its just unecessary.

And Dhark, even if my logic does suck, Im not about to change it. Im a stubborn, if stupid, bastard

You don't make any fucking sense. They're the next generation of games, after Doom 3, all games are gonna look like that. ALL OF THEM. It's just that DOom 3, Halo 2, and Half life 2 have done it first.

Spee · 2004-07-21, 11:58 AM

Originally Posted by Kaltagesta

Why dont you like games that are pretty for pretties sake? You know that gameplay and graphics are mutually exclusive, right? Is FF9 worse than FF10, just because it's graphics are better? Just because a game doesnt need to have good graphics doesnt mean that it's worse because it has.

Both FF9 and FFX sucked enormous amounts of donkeywang, IMO.

And Dhark, I said, this is simply my opinion. Doesnt particularly need to make sense.