Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Filmed on Location
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2012-06-01, 01:09 AM | [Ignore Me] #46 | |||
Master Sergeant
|
|
|||
|
2012-06-01, 01:11 AM | [Ignore Me] #47 | |||
Major General
|
I really cant see the certs been anything more than small tiny upgrades...except the ones that like add a handbrake or something as we saw. |
|||
|
2012-06-01, 01:13 AM | [Ignore Me] #48 | |||
Major
|
The evidence clearly eludes to the fact that it's becoming a less strenuous, time consuming effort to max out a character. The point is, it's just stupid to dismiss an entire legitimate concern based on loose information we've been nonchalantly given over the past months. But what do I know? This game is being modeled after BF3 and the leveling system will probably resemble that exactly. I'm not over familiar with BF3, but in BC2 I put in about 60 hours and only reached about level 30, so who knows. |
|||
|
2012-06-01, 01:18 AM | [Ignore Me] #49 | ||
Master Sergeant
|
Hey now death, I won't speak for everyone but most people do their best to recognize that speculation is the name of the game in these forums right now. The issue hasn't been dismissed, its just being counter argued. As an MMO in general SOE has a long maximum cert system in their best interest. This is especially the case since it is a f2p mmo, where longevity is the money maker. This contrasts with something like BF3, where the developers were only actually concerned with making people commit to that initial purchase.
Two different situations |
||
|
2012-06-01, 01:23 AM | [Ignore Me] #50 | ||
Staff Sergeant
|
I think there's very few people who don't have a problem with it but I wish people would stop using it as the basis for their 'anti-PS1-cert-inventory-system' when it's the mangled horrible result of many years of cert bundles/cost reductions/free awards and bears almost no resemblance to what the original system was designed and balanced to achieve!
|
||
|
2012-06-01, 01:27 AM | [Ignore Me] #51 | |||
Major
|
With that notion established, the majority of posts are constructed in the "it will" fashion, implying that they know exactly what they're talking about, hence the anger fuming from my soul and steam blowing out of my ears. Just kidding, I'm not really that upset, I just despise when people act like they know what they're talking about when they have just as little of a clue as the rest of us. Good point about the BF3 trying to snag people for the initial purchase versus PS2's longevity. One can hope that they will follow through and give us a rigorous leveling system that will take many months to complete, even for the most hardcore gamer. I wouldn't mind another long and strenuous BR 40 grind (with no certs [I feel like I should say that before I'm crucified ]) |
|||
|
2012-06-01, 01:29 AM | [Ignore Me] #52 | ||
Major General
|
the skinner box will keep people playing, then when you have maxed all certs, they release another box for the same ones...this requires 1000 certs to max though...and you like a good little lemming keep p(l)aying, keep paying for increased cert point acquisition.
|
||
|
2012-06-01, 01:29 AM | [Ignore Me] #53 | |||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
I know of day-one newbies that can create a better loadout than this. By the way, care to mention how much exp it takes to get TO 40? 300k a box going from 39 to 40. thats three million exp for just the last level.
__________________
Retired NC CR5, Cerberus Company. Not currently playing PS2. Anyone with a similar name is not me. My only characters are listed in my stats profile here on PSU. Last edited by p0intman; 2012-06-01 at 01:37 AM. |
|||
|
2012-06-01, 01:42 AM | [Ignore Me] #55 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
I think maybe you should be more reasonable. It was never a "BR40" problem. This is something you can do BEFORE BR30. Ready?
Second plasma loadout added for laughs. Really? Man, those thumper whores must be a pain. I'm litterally at the point where the next person who mentions that its a "BR40" supersoldier problem loses all ability to say they ever played planetside at any length.
__________________
Retired NC CR5, Cerberus Company. Not currently playing PS2. Anyone with a similar name is not me. My only characters are listed in my stats profile here on PSU. Last edited by p0intman; 2012-06-01 at 01:45 AM. |
||
|
2012-06-01, 01:54 AM | [Ignore Me] #56 | |||
Sergeant
|
While I can't say if it's going to take 500 hours of playing to unlock all of the certs, or if it'll take 250, or if it'll only take 60, it's a safe assumption that "It will take a long time." They aren't going to have a system where people play for 6 hours and can then unlock everything. With having the ability to unlock things for station cash and buy boosts, they're going to want there to be a reason to spend station cash and buy those boosts. They want to refer to LoL as an analogue for how they're modeling their cash shop, so the issues with the LoL shop are a perfectly valid comparison. Here's a quick rundown of how unlocking things in LoL works for those who are unfamiliar with it: You can buy XP (you gain experience from level 1 to 30, which gets you mastery points - talent points in typical MMO terms - and unlocks rune slots) and IP boosts with Riot Points, the real money LoL currency. You can unlock Champions with Influence Points,the currency you earn by playing the game, and Riot Points. However, you can only unlock Runes with Influence Points, and those are a direct power bonus, so you're a little more inclined to unlock champions with RP so you can save your IP for Runes. You can also unlock different skins for champions as well, but only with RP. Sound familiar? With regards to the main debate in this thread: I don't have a huge problem with letting people be able to be really versatile and unlock all the things. If they played for 500 hours and killed 8 billion dudes they earned it. If those people can't unlock all of the certs on one character, they'll just create another character and unlock the rest of them on that one, and switch back and forth between characters depending on what they want to do at any given time. You can stop that by doing very harsh, restrictive things like limiting players to only one character AND you can only spend up to x number of cert points. At that point, people would just make another account and switch between them. If you use an RPG system, there's no good way around that "THIS GUY CAN DO EVERYTHING AND IS A REALLY VERSATILE PLAYER" problem. I do have a problem with facilitating a high barrier of entry for new players come 6, 12, or 24 months after launch. The nature of games is that people get bored of them after a while and then move on to other things, and if you have game systems in place that are problematic for new players, that's going to hurt the game - and the people that really really really love it and keep playing it - in the long term. If you have a very large playerbase you don't feel that as much (particularly in the case of LoL where players are very heavily separated by level and ELO), but it's still a valid concern. And I'm not saying "THIS WILL KILL TEH GAME!11!" either. I'm saying, "Hey, this is something that's kind of concerning that we should be aware of and keep an eye on as we move forward." Last edited by Virulence; 2012-06-01 at 02:03 AM. |
|||
|
2012-06-01, 02:09 AM | [Ignore Me] #57 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
people pay CCP to skill up in EVE. Thankfully, I do this but haven't actually paid CCP in years. Thankfully, SOE are making PS2 free, with their flawed design they at least know they don't deserve regular cash income from it. Unlike CCP, who have too many lemmings paying them.
__________________
Retired NC CR5, Cerberus Company. Not currently playing PS2. Anyone with a similar name is not me. My only characters are listed in my stats profile here on PSU. |
||
|
2012-06-01, 02:14 AM | [Ignore Me] #58 | |||||
Major
|
When people want the "certification" you can pretty much gaurentee (unless they're a bumbling fucktard) that they're referring the one that shipped with the game originally (limited number of cert points, no cert bundles, no veteran rewards) etc. I'm tired of people's narrow minded views on what the certification system is, and their complete dismissal of it because they think we want the most recent incarnation of it, I.E:
I don't think you know what you want. |
|||||
|
2012-06-01, 02:34 AM | [Ignore Me] #60 | ||
Sergeant
|
Those two things are not mutually exclusive. You can have a certification system that lets someone fill a number of roles depending on the situation but avoids things like, "I have these certs so that means my tank is 50% harder to kill and does 30% more damage so lololol gtfo noobs." It's especially important because PS2 probably isn't going to segregate players into levels/rating like LoL does.
People are going to gravitate towards the playstyle they enjoy most regardless of having the choice of doing everything; sure, there will be times when they switch their roles to min/max in order to greatly benefit their squad/platoon/outfit, and it's cool that they have that choice - and it should be that their experience dictates their advantage, not "does x thing y% better because they unlocked z cert." You want to have people heavily restricted on what they have access to, sure - but they're going to pick the thing they love most, neglect everything else, and I wouldn't be surprised to see spam like "LF GAL PILOT WITH CLOAK BUBBLE CERT TO DEPLOY FOR ZERG PST!1!!" because people are just certed into the thing they like the most - killing dudes in whatever fashion, and the dedicated gal pilots with the really really good cert are probably going to be exclusively running with their outfit. Who does that benefit, really? |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|