Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: So do we get a second chance?
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2012-07-30, 10:33 PM | [Ignore Me] #47 | ||
Sergeant
|
not a 100% sure what I mean. What I'm trying to get at is to link it to something in real life that would be hard to replace or fake. Perhaps using a real name and credit card to confirm it, or something. Not really sure what would be the best way to do it.
|
||
|
2012-07-30, 10:38 PM | [Ignore Me] #50 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
Anyway, I'm sure Punkbuster isn't the only thing they're doing to attempt to reduce hacking, and they'd be stupid to say what all else they would be using. |
|||
|
2012-07-30, 11:07 PM | [Ignore Me] #55 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
Ultimately, you aren't going to stop people from hacking (either you are on the defensive, responding to specific threats as best you can, or you have terribly intrusive anti-cheating software that prevents legit people from playing like Brawl Busters and invades people's privacy and still on the defensive, trying to respond to new threats as they come). The important things are to make it difficult enough to be done so that it isn't overly prolific, and to completely ban-hammer people that cheat in the first place. On of the good things about persistent accounts is that they encourage people to hang onto them, even if they don't pay for them, because they sink time into them. People who are willing to put that time into it are less likely to use cheats and risk losing it all. People who don't care and cheat anyway will get bored because there's no persistent progression and without persistence there is little this game offers that can't be had in other games or other forms of entertainment in general. Then all you have to worry about is DDOS from disgruntled a-holes, and there's not that much that can be done other than having a good bandwidth and shiz (and criminal prosecution). |
|||
|
2012-07-30, 11:19 PM | [Ignore Me] #56 | |||
Corporal
|
A) Enter a CC number which is validated by SOE, but not charged. -or- B) Enter a mobile phone number, receive a code via text message, and use that to validate. That way, the hassle of making a new account becomes prohibitive for cheaters, but not enough to turn too many people away. |
|||
|
2012-07-30, 11:33 PM | [Ignore Me] #58 | ||
Thinking about what Renagade posted made me think about linking accounts to cell phone numbers. When u start a new account Soe will text you a confirmation code that you would have to enter to activate the account yes both Facebook and my bank use this method. If someone gets banned and start a new account then they would need a new phone number. This would make it more costly to them in time and or money hopefully discouraging most from getting banned in the first place.
|
|||
|
2012-07-30, 11:36 PM | [Ignore Me] #59 | ||||
Private
|
Last edited by SkarBlade; 2012-07-30 at 11:46 PM. |
||||
|
2012-07-31, 12:23 AM | [Ignore Me] #60 | |||
First Sergeant
|
The phone linked acct seems like a pretty good idea. I doubt someone is going to go out and buy a tracfone so they can get a new acct activated.
SOE could also simply figure out what vulnerability the hack is exploiting in order to find the users of that hack in order to cull them. They wouldn't even have to close the vulnerability, just monitor it. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|