Smed Tweet, Carrier? - Page 5 - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: Some cheesecake would be really good right about now
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Reply
Click here to go to the first VIP post in this thread.  
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2012-11-29, 11:07 PM   [Ignore Me] #61
Crator
Major General
 
Crator's Avatar
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


I smell OS launcher from carrier.
__________________
>>CRATOR<<
Don't feed the trolls, unless it's funny to do so...
Crator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-29, 11:26 PM   [Ignore Me] #62
Gimpylung
Master Sergeant
 
Gimpylung's Avatar
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


Carrier = Outfit Base?
Gimpylung is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-30, 12:21 AM   [Ignore Me] #63
Riekopo
Sergeant
 
Riekopo's Avatar
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


I'd like to see an air transport for vehicles first!
Riekopo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-30, 01:32 AM   [Ignore Me] #64
Accuser
Sergeant Major
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


I'd pay money for my Flash to have a Dixie Horn, for my Sunderer's horn to be "la cucaracha", and for this thing to play Imperial March in a 1km radius.
Accuser is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-30, 01:57 AM   [Ignore Me] #65
Timealude
Captain
 
Timealude's Avatar
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


Originally Posted by Riekopo View Post
I'd like to see an air transport for vehicles first!
Thats what this looks to be. And also from the tweet smedly posted it seems to be hinting at it.
Timealude is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-30, 02:00 AM   [Ignore Me] #66
Sifer2
Major
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


If this does end up playing out like Battlefield 2142's Titan mode I will be happy. Though I hope they can deal with some of the performance issues it had in that game. Was real annoying how when the ships moved it caused physics glitches inside like deployed turrets falling through the floor.

Now the question is who gets to steer the thing? Outfit leader? Are they built by Outfits pooling lots of resources? Can't wait to hear details.
Sifer2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-30, 02:20 AM   [Ignore Me] #67
Necronile
Sergeant
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


Looks useless,especially with the small continents we have now...
Necronile is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-30, 03:42 AM   [Ignore Me] #68
Reaver
Private
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


Originally Posted by Necronile View Post
Looks useless,especially with the small continents we have now...
I think if they intend to go the vehicle transport route with this it will only be two to three times bigger than the galaxy.
Reaver is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-30, 04:43 AM   [Ignore Me] #69
Akrasjel Lanate
Private
 
Akrasjel Lanate's Avatar
 
Misc Info
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


Originally Posted by Hamma View Post
I thought it was something from EVE at first.. but it says Terran Republic on it.
Yea it looks Caldari, but it's not.
Akrasjel Lanate is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-30, 04:53 AM   [Ignore Me] #70
Whiteagle
Major
 
Whiteagle's Avatar
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


Originally Posted by Nightleaf View Post
It looks air bound cause of the turrets on the underside of the carrier.
Indeed, unless they're for fighting submarines... but then why would they have CIWS radomes?

Originally Posted by getembees View Post
Wow that carrier looks like just what PS2 needs to help with combined-arms logistics and zerg-coralling.

As many of us have spoken of before, the n00b experience can be difficult. But seeing this gives me an optimistic outlook about this games early-stage growth.

With just 1 or 2 of these per continent, each empire could better coordinate everything. Make it a permanent spawn point and the zerg will rush to it for acton; likely because the Faction-Leaders will be keeping this baby near the front lines. The more tools leaders have to coordinate the Zerg, the more interesting this game gets!

This will also likely help centralize the air-war. These carriers will be big targets and air-wings will flock from far and wide to take out and defend these carriers.

Looking forward to hearing more!
Indeed, "Flagships" like this would really help solidify where the tip of the spear should be, focusing the Zerg into a precise blast of Manpower.

Originally Posted by dethred View Post
I was just thinking the other day that this thing needs a Titan-like ship mechanic like 2142.
Eerie, I was too...

They were to be called Forward Operations Centers, and they would come in Terrestrial (Think the Mammoth from Halo 4) and Airborne Hovering (I.E. this) types.

Certainly would ruin your day to see an A.H.F.O.C. or T.F.O.C. pull up to your base.

Originally Posted by Accuser View Post
I'd pay money for my Flash to have a Dixie Horn, for my Sunderer's horn to be "la cucaracha", and for this thing to play Imperial March in a 1km radius.
As much as I love the Imperial March, our Outfit kind of already has something for when the Gals dust off this baby:


Have to maintain the theme and all...
Whiteagle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-30, 05:01 AM   [Ignore Me] #71
Figment
Lieutenant General
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


Originally Posted by Fear The Amish View Post
i think its funny because its concept art for PS next that people think it can only be used in that game.... when they own the license to that...
I think it's funny you think T-Ray would allow it to go in, in this artstyle.

Even if they use the concept, it'd look completely different: meaning not based on the looks of a modern aircraft carrier and fitting in with the rounded, 90/45 degree angled and scarabee themes of the empires.
Figment is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-30, 05:20 AM   [Ignore Me] #72
Timealude
Captain
 
Timealude's Avatar
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


Originally Posted by Figment View Post
I think it's funny you think T-Ray would allow it to go in, in this artstyle.

Even if they use the concept, it'd look completely different: meaning not based on the looks of a modern aircraft carrier and fitting in with the rounded, 90/45 degree angled and scarabee themes of the empires.
That is true.

anyways heres another link to the full profile.

In those It seems the VS and NC have their own, the VS one is called Apocalypse. Also this one is lightly armed according to the description here. It has spawn tubes on it as well as it could be just an aircraft carrier not just a ground vehicle one. Im also guessing this could be our "navy" as it were, instead of water bound ships we would have airships instead......this is all just speculation though.

Last edited by Timealude; 2012-11-30 at 06:20 AM.
Timealude is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-30, 05:48 AM   [Ignore Me] #73
Mavvvy
Corporal
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


Squeeeeeeeeeee.

Lol I guess that air power thread is going to get a little more heated :P .

Apologies for double post very excited here

Last edited by Mavvvy; 2012-11-30 at 06:17 AM.
Mavvvy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-30, 06:16 AM   [Ignore Me] #74
Mavvvy
Corporal
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


Just thinking trying to take down one of those badboys alone would add so much to the meta, if its one per faction and capping facilities/capture points has some influence over it building/destroying it. Cant help bot think of 2142 titans and all that.

Last edited by Mavvvy; 2012-11-30 at 06:21 AM.
Mavvvy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-30, 06:32 AM   [Ignore Me] #75
Timealude
Captain
 
Timealude's Avatar
 
Re: Smed Tweet, Carrier?


Originally Posted by Mavvvy View Post
Just thinking trying to take down one of those badboys alone would add so much to the meta, if its one per faction and capping facilities/capture points has some influence over it building/destroying it. Cant help bot think of 2142 titans and all that.
ya, it also says that if there arent enough people to run it ((the idea is 20-22)) players, I.A would take over to replace people that werent there.
Timealude is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 PM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.