Heavy Tanks - Page 5 - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: No I will not make out with you.
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 1 Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2004-11-02, 02:32 PM   [Ignore Me] #61
Warborn
Contributor
Major General
 
Warborn's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by Gryphon
My post was in response to you commenting on his post, not thinking you were directing it at me.
So, what, you're trying to reply for him? I don't get it. You posted to make your joke. Super, I'm sure if SandTrout still posted here he'd be embarassed at his lack of foresight or whatever. Then, hazzer posted as if to continue a long-dead discussion. Waste of time, says I. He was also misunderstanding what the original person was saying. I don't see how him clearly misunderstanding something, and even going so far as to post a screenshot to illustrate that Galaxies do actually have an interior of sorts to them, was a joke as you said it was. And in response to me telling him that there's no point in trying to continue the aside that one guy made about galaxies having an interior, you told me why you bumped the thread? And then you said his misunderstanding was actually a joke? Is this basically what's going on? I'm not missing anything?

Last edited by Warborn; 2004-11-02 at 02:34 PM.
Warborn is offline  
Old 2004-11-02, 03:00 PM   [Ignore Me] #62
Ghryphen
PSU Code Monkey
 
Ghryphen's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by Warborn
So, what, you're trying to reply for him? I don't get it. You posted to make your joke. Super, I'm sure if SandTrout still posted here he'd be embarassed at his lack of foresight or whatever. Then, hazzer posted as if to continue a long-dead discussion. Waste of time, says I. He was also misunderstanding what the original person was saying. I don't see how him clearly misunderstanding something, and even going so far as to post a screenshot to illustrate that Galaxies do actually have an interior of sorts to them, was a joke as you said it was. And in response to me telling him that there's no point in trying to continue the aside that one guy made about galaxies having an interior, you told me why you bumped the thread? And then you said his misunderstanding was actually a joke? Is this basically what's going on? I'm not missing anything?
Yes I am replying in defense of him. I mentioned that I bumped the thread to induce comments on previous discussions also to reinforce that defense. I could care less if SandTrout is around (btw he is), makes no difference to the original purpose of the bump. But I guess the humor passes by some people... ie below:

I don't see how him clearly misunderstanding something, and even going so far as to post a screenshot to illustrate that Galaxies do actually have an interior of sorts to them, was a joke as you said it was.
He is implying that they are reading newspapers/magizines in that galaxy sshot, I understood it as a joke.
__________________

Twitter | Dragon Wolves

Last edited by Ghryphen; 2004-11-02 at 03:20 PM.
Ghryphen is offline  
Old 2004-11-02, 03:22 PM   [Ignore Me] #63
Warborn
Contributor
Major General
 
Warborn's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by Gryphon
Yes I am replying in defense of him. I mentioned that I bumped the thread to induce comments on previous discussions also to reinforce that defense. I could care less if SandTrout is around, makes no difference to the original purpose of the bump. But I guess the humor passes by some people... ie below:
If you wanted to spur new discussion you shouldn't have resurrected a year+ old thread. The number of replies in this thread assuming that the posts before yours aren't incredibly old should demonstrate my point quite clearly.

Also, should I be directed my replies to hazzer2007 to you instead, or are you only posting for him today?

He is implying that they are reading newspapers/magizines in that galaxy sshot, I understood it as a joke.
Yeah, that humor must have passed me by like nothing before, because I'm vomiting out my intestines -- such is the fury of my laughter -- now that I realize what he was writing was actually a joke.
Warborn is offline  
Old 2004-11-02, 03:33 PM   [Ignore Me] #64
Ghryphen
PSU Code Monkey
 
Ghryphen's Avatar
 


Actually I wanted to see how people would respond as to what was said in previous speculations by bumping this thread. However I shall now clearly state my intentions if this ever were to happen again so those who need to loosen up a bit will understand and won't derail the original intent. I figured it would be clear enough, I suppose I was wrong.

And as for replying for him or me; as much as you feel you have the right to condemn peoples posting, I feel I can have the right to defend them if I wish.
__________________

Twitter | Dragon Wolves

Last edited by Ghryphen; 2004-11-02 at 03:34 PM.
Ghryphen is offline  
Old 2004-11-02, 09:38 PM   [Ignore Me] #65
internetn
Sergeant Major
 


Is it wrong to question why somebody started up a pretty much dead thread?

No

Is it wrong to make such a big deal about it and argue with a ADM?

Possibly

Who cares if the threads a year old? I don't, and it seems not many other people do either. So why don't we stop acting like three year olds and try to post normally.

I think a Heavy Tank would be awsome, but then I said that about the BFR's and everybody whines about how much they change the game, and their too strong. I think they add a sense of evolution to the game. Technology gets better, some people get pissed, and other people incorporate it to the advancement of humanity. To bad I'm not a VS, my ideals seem to be better suited towards there philosphy
__________________
<{Channler}>

http://www.lastknights.com/index.php?action=register&ref_id=5639

internetn is offline  
Old 2004-11-02, 09:49 PM   [Ignore Me] #66
Spee
Colonel
 
Spee's Avatar
 


/me never looks at time stamps.
/me sucks at this game. =/
__________________
Spee is offline  
Old 2004-11-02, 09:54 PM   [Ignore Me] #67
Baneblade
Contributor
Lieutenant General
 
Baneblade's Avatar
 


I want my Devastator.
__________________
Post at me bro.

Baneblade is offline  
Old 2004-11-03, 03:25 AM   [Ignore Me] #68
WritheNC
First Lieutenant
 


I haven't read any posts in this thread.

To me, BFR's are the heavy tanks with an extreme range of mobility. I would prefer normal heavy tanks thought I guess.
WritheNC is offline  
Old 2004-11-03, 11:07 AM   [Ignore Me] #69
Warborn
Contributor
Major General
 
Warborn's Avatar
 


Originally Posted by internetn
Who cares if the threads a year old? I don't, and it seems not many other people do either. So why don't we stop acting like three year olds and try to post normally.
Yeah, this thread is a hot-bead of discussion. Why, look at all the people who were posting in a manner which Gryphon had expected. Although there are far too many to count by hand alone, there's at least one person posting "on topic", as it were. Incredible!

Who cares if the threads a year old? The fact that every post since the the bump that wassn't been related to the same vein of posts as my post here is had been one accidentally assuming that this thread isn't over a year old should have made it hernia-inducingly clear who should care if it's a year old.

But maybe if I post more we'll get enough backseat admins to jump in, try to post against me, and then do their best to prove that Gryphon wasn't mistaken in his assumption as to the value of bumping an incredibly old thread. I mean, Christ, if it weren't for me bumping this thread with my posts, it'd be well on its way back down to the basement again, wouldn't it?
Warborn is offline  
Old 2004-11-03, 01:33 PM   [Ignore Me] #70
martyr
Contributor
Brigadier General
 
martyr's Avatar
 
Misc Info


warborn, i have two things i'd like to point out.

first, gryphon is not a "back seat admin." i don't even know what that is, actually. he's a full-on administrator. i myself am a super-moderator and make no claims to the auspicious title of "administrator" here at PSU, although we staff refer to ourselves collectively as the "admin team."

second: you're criticizing him for bumping a thread?
not only that, but on the grounds that he was "mistaken in his assumptions as to the value of bumping" this thread?

you have got to be kidding.

sod off, get a life.




now, as for the heavy tanks:

i think, and this sentiment has been echoed countless times in the last few weeks, that the most important feature of any heavy tank vehicle would be the required crew. this is something that's been highlighted in the many discussions regarding gunships, airships, and naval vessels (nuclear wessels?).
__________________
-martyr
martyr is offline  
Old 2004-11-03, 01:46 PM   [Ignore Me] #71
Ghryphen
PSU Code Monkey
 
Ghryphen's Avatar
 


Maybe it would have been on topic had someone who is not a moderator didn't try and moderate peoples posting as so many people think they have the right to do here. Worthless comments are quite annoying and I got a bit frustrated at the fact someone was making yet another 1.2.3. points post in an effort to attack another persons post adding zero value to a thread and made me go nazi.

Maybe had you not made your lame attack on another persons post and pushed me over the edge the thread would have had a different turn. But no, you have no fault right?

Lighten up, take the stick out of your ass. You win, thread closed....or does that make me win?
__________________

Twitter | Dragon Wolves
Ghryphen is offline  
Closed Thread
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 1 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 AM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.