Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Must obey Hamma...... Must obey Hamma......
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
2004-05-29, 10:44 AM | [Ignore Me] #61 | ||
Master Sergeant
|
going on a head to head basis a full thunderer, raider and arura are all about equal aginst eachother. But the problem comes that for every 1 radier the tr can pump out and fully load, the vanu and nc can pump out 2. Now trying to take down 2 tunderers with one raidr is a helpless cause and you might as well just bend over and grab your ankles. I alos do find it quite redicular that the thuderers shells will take out a rexo in one shot. Pretty much what the nc now have in their arsenal is a non tech plant tank. Im not saying the tr got the crappyest one but its the same with the prowler. sure its good that we can fit 3 people in there but we stand no chance when the nc can gun 5 vans in a full squad and we can only get 3. If we had the dominant majority of players in our empire id say having more seats would be a good idea but otherwise were just getting bent over on the deal
__________________
you keep talking but all i hear is blah blah blah im a dirty whore |
||
|
2004-05-29, 11:41 AM | [Ignore Me] #64 | ||
thunderers no longer take out infanty in one shot (agile/rexo) unless they had some damage already
Also the Raider has much more DOT than Any of the other dels, i personaly think more gunners is an advantage, keeping two behind and two forward was quiet effective last night untill NC started binging in the tanks
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
2004-05-29, 11:54 AM | [Ignore Me] #65 | |||
|
||||
|
2004-05-29, 12:05 PM | [Ignore Me] #66 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
__________________
|
|||
|
2004-05-29, 12:44 PM | [Ignore Me] #67 | |||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
i was in a mood at the time i posted that. But to be honest, a insult is a insult no matter what the standard.... but i forgive you, because you love the Gunship as much as me.
__________________
I love you, You love me, Lets go kill those dammn NC's With their jackhammer shotguns, And their Phoenix Missiles too, and make them wish they were barney's too. Last edited by Onizuka-GTO; 2004-05-29 at 12:47 PM. |
|||
|
2004-05-29, 03:48 PM | [Ignore Me] #68 | |||
|
||||
|
2004-05-29, 04:20 PM | [Ignore Me] #69 | ||||||
Second Lieutenant
|
__________________
You last visited: 03-18-2005 at 01:50 PM - lol time flies |
||||||
|
2004-05-29, 06:46 PM | [Ignore Me] #70 | ||||||
However, where the Thunderer can be outfitted with idiots and still do fine because each gun is powerful in its own right, the Raider suffers, because pubbies will not work together on anything but obvious targets (a single Vanguard bearing down on the vehicle, for instance) which means that out of the hands of a very coordinated crew the Raider flounders, because each gun isn't practical enough to compensate for the lack of teamwork inherent in pick up crews. In most cases, Raiders are just a novelty, firing rounds every which way, not doing any serious damage while taking five potential infantry out of the fight. |
|||||||
|
2004-05-29, 11:26 PM | [Ignore Me] #71 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
He's speak truth. With all four guns trained on a target, almost everything except aircrafts at considerable range will be defeat.
I was running in terror in my Magrider when i saw a Raider (which i found out had a full crew and were obviously working well together), and even that wasn't enough since the Raider is faster then a Magrider and it chased me until i either found a safe base or died. Thunderer i run from immediately, i don't hang around to play with. Thunderer = end of fun.
__________________
I love you, You love me, Lets go kill those dammn NC's With their jackhammer shotguns, And their Phoenix Missiles too, and make them wish they were barney's too. |
||
|
2004-06-01, 02:15 AM | [Ignore Me] #75 | ||
First Sergeant
|
I just gotta say it, Raider sux. Period. It is much better to roll a Del than a raider any day. I would much rather roll two dels than 1 Raider anyway (Bettery damage and more chance for at least one vehicle to survive AND requires just as much coordination as the Raider BUT only requires 1 more body).
For the VS who are complaining, yeah, yours is not as good as it could be, but you can always roll a Del, so you have two choices in platforms. You have the original Del which is a great vehicle AND you get the rolling mortar platform which can be very effective in the right circumstances. I don't take any NC complaints seriously, they are obviously posting as a disinformation campaign to try to stave off any nerfs. No, Warborn hit it correctly, the devs are interpreting the TR motto to do less with more. More people to do the job than other empires. I don't mind throwing more bullets, but requiring more people is insane.
__________________
KIAsan [BWC] If it's not nailed down, it's mine. If I can pry it up, it's not nailed down. |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|